Friday, October 9, 2009

Sean Beck or Glenn Hannity?

Which one is the bigger lying smear artist -- Sean Beck or Glenn Hannity ---- or are they interchangeable?

68 comments:

datadog said...

I'm looking for a liberal blog that is not from 2 years ago. Are there any other blogs that are current.
CJP these subjects are old tired and repetitive I'm sure there is real news out there.

CJP said...

It is today's news that President Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize and that the predictable reaction of the Right-Wing media was to blast him for this incredible achievement.

The Right-Wing media is doing to Obama exactly what they did in the past to Clinton, Gore and Kerry.

My hobby is to keep track of these daily outrages by the Right-Wing media and to make people aware of them through these posts.

My latest posts are based on the smears which emanated from the Right-Wing media today, yesterday and the day before.

I don't blame you for feeling that these are old and tired. Two years ago, the Right-Wing was doing the same thing. In fact, they were doing it 16 years ago -- when Clinton first took office.

They will never stop doing it -- and I'm very glad to respond to them.

CJP said...

You should check out a Blog called Media Matters for America. They are probably the most informative liberal Blog in the entire Blogosphere.

Brandon said...

CJP-

When are you going to attemt a debate on something important? Examples: illegal alliens getting into the public option and why we havent passed anything fixing the health care system.

Anonymous said...

I'm glad that there are people out there that are telling the truth and CJP is one of them. NOT the CONS. Brainwashing is one of their tricks and the dummies are not even recognizing that they're being brainwashed and falling into their traps. Haha. I feel sorry for you CONS for feeling so much hatred towards your very own citizens.

Thanks CJP for your posts.

datadog said...

Do you know of any blogs like yours that are not yours. That are current. One thing about you CJP you keep the Blog current. But I'm just bored now. You won't talk about the things they are doing to Health Care right now. You won't talk about how the International community is talking about getting out of the dollar. Which would kill us all with inflation.
What you are doing is distracting people from the real news going on right under their nose while you bitch about smears. CJP your a good writer, but your subject is stale and bland. Anybody know another blog like this one.

datadog said...

Thanks, Brandon hope I read you in the blogosphere.

RayGun said...

DD, Faux News is a big problem. It feeds cons the meat they want to perpetuate the myths that have formed in their heads.

CJP said...

Datadog:

I'm not talking about Health Care now because I'm waiting to see what kind of plan they come up with.

I do hope that a Health Care reform plan is passed before the end of the year and that it includes a public option.

But right now, there are too many proposals going back and forth, and I'm waiting for things to become more concrete.

I keep focusing on the smears because this constant daily onslaught of Right-Wing smears could paralyze the administration and prevent Obama from accomplishing anything worthwhile. That, of course, is the goal of the opposition. I don't want to see them get away with it.

RayGun said...

"But right now, there are too many proposals going back and forth, and I'm waiting for things to become more concrete."
--
Dead on CJP.

It's funny how the right keeps calling all these plans Obamas plans. And that idiot at Obamas speech that yelled "you lie", when all there is, is a proposal.

I am having a harder and harder time taking them seriously, although your sites cons are too bad, but at other sites, all you can do is mock them as they've been so brainwashed you can't get through to them.

Brandon said...

"And that idiot at Obamas speech that yelled "you lie", when all there is, is a proposal."
-Raygun

Have you read the fourteenth amendment to the constitution? Do you think that is would force the U.S. to allow illegal alliens into our public option, if passed?

It sure sounds that way to me. Also, I got that lead from FOX. Have you read anything about it in the New York Times?

RayGun said...

JC BB, we are not going to give illegals full bore free medical care, except maybe w's version ie; the emergency room.

It never would of passed. We can't afford it.

Brandon said...

"It never would of passed. We can't afford it."
-Raygun

Sorry to let you know, but the 14the amendment has already passed!

Ok, I know that not what your talking about. LOL But if you read the 14th amendment it would seem that it gives illegals that right.

After reading it what do you think and would you support a public option knowing that illegals have to be giving access?

RayGun said...

JC BB, the tard cons interpreting the 14 amendment for you are not on the supreme court. Believe me, or not, the Supreme Court justices's know more about the constitution than the Faux News pedants. Don't listen to them BB, they are fking with you.

Brandon said...

"JC BB, the tard cons interpreting the 14 amendment for you are not on the supreme court. Believe me, or not, the Supreme Court justices's know more about the constitution than the Faux News pedants. Don't listen to them BB, they are fking with you."
-Raygun

I only get basic info from the news, I do my own research!

READ THE 14TH AMENDMENT AND TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK IT MEANS IN REGUARDS TO THE PUBLIC OPTION?

RayGun said...

"READ THE 14TH AMENDMENT AND TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK IT MEANS IN REGUARDS TO THE PUBLIC OPTION? "
--
Who put that into your head? No one in the real world is talking about that.

Brandon said...

"Who put that into your head? No one in the real world is talking about that."
-Reaper

Read it and tell me what you think? Try watching something besides the liberal media!

RayGun said...

"Read it and tell me what you think? Try watching something besides the liberal media! "
--
Please tell me what you watched to hear the above?

Brandon said...

Let me help you:

Section 1. All persons... or naturalized in the United States, ... are citizens of the United States... No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; ...nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Read the entire thing at:

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment14/

Brandon said...

"Please tell me what you watched to hear the above?"
-Raygun

It was on O'Reilly

CJP said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
CJP said...

Brandon:

The 14th Amendment does not say anything about illegal immigrants and the public option. Congress, in writing the new law, can specifically provide whether or not illegal immigrants are barred from the public option or from any other benefits of the health reform law.

CJP said...

Brandon:

Conservatives -- playing their usual mind games -- are trying to shift the focus to benefits which illegal immigrants may or may not receive under the new health reform legislation. However, the real issue is what benefits will American citizens and legal immigrants receive as a result of health care reform. That's where the real focus belongs, not on the red herring side issue of some benefits possibly going to illegal immigrants.

RayGun said...

WH aide: Fox News operates like an arm of the GOP

“The reality of it is that Fox often operates almost as either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican Party,” White House Communications Director Anita Dunn said in an interview that aired Sunday on CNN’s “Reliable Sources.”

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/10/12/wh-aide-fox-news-operates-like-an-arm-of-the-gop-2/

Brandon said...

"The 14th Amendment does not say anything about illegal immigrants and the public option. Congress, in writing the new law, can specifically provide whether or not illegal immigrants are barred from the public option or from any other benefits of the health reform law."
-CJP

If... the 14th amendment does provide those rights to illegal alliens, then congress can put what ever they want into the bill and it will be over powered by a little thing called the constitution. (That is where you will find the 14th amendment)

I believe the only way around it would be a another amendment to the constitution and that will never be done, since most liberals want illegals to be covered.

Brandon said...

14th amendment:
Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States...

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens...

CJP:

It doesnt need to mention the public option to allow illegals coverage!

RayGun said...

"since most liberals want illegals to be covered. "
--
JFC, progressives don't want that. How can cons claim illegals, expect to have our laws apply to them? Do you see the contradictions (laws and illegals)?

BB, no one is suggesting we are going to pay full bore medical for the whatever million Mexican immigrants and their kids. It's a lie.

Brandon said...

"How can cons claim illegals, expect to have our laws apply to them? Do you see the contradictions (laws and illegals)?"
-Raygun

Havent you noticed that our country doesnt seem to care we have "ILLEGALS" living here?


Work Permits Granted to 28 Arrested in February ICE Raid:

http://www.numbersusa.com/content/news/april-1-2009/work-permits-granted-28-arrested-february-ice-raid.html

RayGun said...

"Havent you noticed that our country doesnt seem to care we have "ILLEGALS" living here?"
--
JFC BB, they keep costs down. Isn't that what the great business men want? WTF?

Brandon said...

"JFC BB, they keep costs down. Isn't that what the great business men want? WTF?"
-Raygun

So you dont agrue that our government doesnt care about having ILLEGALS here?

As for the jobs, for every illegal working, thats one jobs that could go to someone on unemployment. Lets promote LEGAL immigration, so we can get the best and brightest of the world, instead of the bottom of the barrel.

Have you looked over the first line of the 14th amendment and the word "naturalization"?

RayGun said...

JC BB, you do not understand how the law works...

Who's going to mow your lawns, pack your meat,tend to your kids? Legal immigrants???

Brandon said...

"JC BB, you do not understand how the law works...

Who's going to mow your lawns, pack your meat,tend to your kids? Legal immigrants???"
-Raygun

I'll take care of that on my own.

Maybe you could explain to me where I am making my mistake in my interpretation of the 14th amendment or just the law in general.

RayGun said...

BB, you want a constitutional law expert, go ask Obama. He is the expert, from his education at Harvard, and general understanding and application of words.

That's what law is all about... Words.

BB, do you know how case law applies to the constitution?

Brandon said...

"BB, do you know how case law applies to the constitution?"
-Raygun

Its all about precedents!

Brandon said...

I am not saying I am an expert, but I have taken some RCW classes, thats Washington states law.

Brandon said...

"BB, you want a constitutional law expert, go ask Obama. He is the expert..."
-Raygun

Thats whats so funny about this entire conversation, HE SHOULD KNOW!!!

RayGun said...

RCW has nothing to do with the constitution.

Please go ask OLielly about constitutional precedence and interpretation.

RayGun said...

"Thats whats so funny about this entire conversation, HE SHOULD KNOW!!!
--

Exactly BB as you and Olielly should know....

Brandon said...

"RCW has nothing to do with the constitution."
-Raygun

I know it doesnt, but I does have alot to do with law in general.

Brandon said...

"Exactly BB as you and Olielly should know...."
-Raygun

What is that suppose to mean?

Brandon said...

Raygun-
I left you another comment under:
"The American Taliban"

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1274756499411972879&postID=2401763260535221911

RayGun said...

"Exactly BB as you and Olielly should know...."
--
Obama is a lawyer. His wife is a lawyer. Both graduated from Harvard. So you and Olielly are going to argue with them???

Brandon said...

"Maybe you could explain to me where I am making my mistake in my interpretation of the 14th amendment or just the law in general."
-Brandon

Are you going to correct me or not?

Brandon said...

"Obama is a lawyer. His wife is a lawyer. Both graduated from Harvard. So you and Olielly are going to argue with them???"
-Raygun

I would argue with them, that is if they werent afraid to go on FOX! Either Obama knows about this or he is an idiot and no, I dont believe he is an idiot!

RayGun said...

Are you going to correct me or not?
--
BB, I am not an expert on constitutional law. Neither are you or Olielly. Precedents make the whole issue very complicated. Words.... Poets....

RayGun said...

fk faux news. they have ruined the country.

Brandon said...

"BB, I am not an expert on constitutional law. Neither are you or Olielly. Precedents make the whole issue very complicated. Words.... Poets...."
-Raygun

The federal supreme court can over rule any precedents. So if an organization takes on this issue, such as the ACLU, they could take it to court and the supreme court could make a ruling on it.

My question to you is: After reading the 14th amendment, do you believe it would qualify illegal alliens in the public option?

It sure seems they would to me?

Brandon said...

"fk faux news. they have ruined the country."
-Raygun

Nice generalization! FOX has allowed you to hear an issue you never heard from any other liberal media outlet. FOX is fair and balanced, you just dont like hearing from conservatives. Why do you liberals want to silence the opposition?

RayGun said...

"My question to you is: After reading the 14th amendment, do you believe it would qualify illegal alliens in the public option?"

BB the thing was written 250 years ago. Times have changed. Case law understands that.

Brandon said...

"BB the thing was written 250 years ago. Times have changed. Case law understands that."
-Raygun

Case law doesnt matter! Case law is only an interpretation of the law that was writen 250yrs ago. So what is your current interpretation of the 14th amendment?

Brandon said...

The courts dont create law, they only interpretate them!

RayGun said...

"FOX is fair and balanced,"
--
Oh my dear God, you have shown that repetitive nonsense, no matter how untrue, is taken and in instilled in our being as the truth.

BB, do you get what I am saying..

RayGun said...

Precedence dear BB, precedence...

Brandon said...

"BB, do you get what I am saying.."
-Raygun

Yes, all new stations air false information and exaggerations. When it works in your favor its ok, but when FOX does it your all over it like stink on manure.

FOX airs alot of liberal ideas and have some great reporters. You and CJP are fixed on guys like Glen Beck who are opinion reporters. They are suppose to be bias, it their opinion.

On the other hand you have people like Gretta who have democrats on daily giving their views and opinions.

"Fair and Balanced"

Brandon said...

"Precedence dear BB, precedence..."
-Raygun

You really dont get it! Precendence can be overturned overnight.

RayGun said...

"Fair and Balanced"
--
Greta loves Palin.

Obama hates Faux News.

How do I trust.... Hmmmm

RayGun said...

Its hard BB, when 250 years have been built upon it. It really fucks shit up when its over turned. It doesnt happen often.

Brandon said...

"Its hard BB, when 250 years have been built upon it. It really fucks shit up when its over turned. It doesnt happen often."
-Raygun

It doesnt happend often, but it does happend every now and again!

Why do you think Obama is unwilling to go on FOX?

Are you implying that because Grettat likes Palin she must be bias? She had Hilary Clinton on not to long ago.

CJP said...

Brandon:

The 14th Amendment applies to "All persons born or naturalized in the United States". It states that those people are citizens. The 14th Amendment says nothing at all about illegal immigrants. It does not deal with the subject.

The 14th Amendment was adopted shortly after the Civil War and its purpose was to ensure that all former slaves who had been born in the United States were now full citizens of this country. It is defining who is a citizen, namely -- "All persons born in the United States", even if they had previously been slaves; and all persons who had become or would become naturalized citizens. In that sense, the 14th Amendment was dealing with Legal immigrants who became naturalized citizens. It says nothing at all about illegal immigrants.

Illegal immigration may not have been much of a problem in 1868 when the 14th Amendment was adopted, so that issue was not dealt with at that time or in that amendment.

Brandon said...

"...nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
-14th amendment

My point is there is alot of grey area in this amendment and all it would take is for a court to make a ruling on this issue. This line doesnt mention anything about being a citizen. So does it grant every PERSON the same legal rights?

Would the public option be a legal right to Americans?

CJP said...

I don't know the answer to that one. It's a very good question. A "person" could be interpreted to include an illegal alien. But, then again, this would mean that an illegal alien is now entitled to the equal protection of all the laws that are currently on the books.

I'm not aware of any case where an illegal alien has brought a lawsuit claiming that the equal protection of the laws applied to him. Do you know of such a case?

CJP said...

Brandon, I think the real answer to your question is that an illegal immigrant lives with the constant risk of being discovered and deported. Therefore, an illegal immigrant is most likely to avoid America's legal system, and not try to use it for his benefit.

For example, if an illegal immigrant went into court and invoked the Fourteenth Amendment, which provides for the "equal protection of the laws" -- well, among those laws are the laws providing for the deportation of illegal immigrants. Those laws would probably take precedence over any laws which are on the books for the benefit of "persons" who are living here legally.

Everyone who is living here legally -- whether or not that "person" is a citizen -- has a Social Security number. If an illegal immigrant went to court suing for the "equal protection of the laws", that person would have to provide his Social Security number. If he cannot do so, he would probably have given himself away and be subject to deportation.

It is hard to imagine how an illegal immigrant could obtain a Social Security number, except through some sort of fraud. Once the fraud is discovered, that person once again is subject to deportation. Every contact that such a person has with the U. S. legal system brings him one step closer to deportation.

So, it is very unlikely that any illegal immigrant would ever try to invoke the "equal protection of the laws" under the Fourteenth Amendment. Those "laws" include the deportation laws.

CJP

RayGun said...

"So, it is very unlikely that any illegal immigrant would ever try to invoke the "equal protection of the laws"
--
But it doesn't stop Faux News from trying to scare it's base by using yet another disingenuous scenario.

Why can't Obama say Fk Faux News? How many, if not all, news organizations did w stiff? NYTimes for sure.

I think Obama should start breaking up Murdochs little nest of rags, as he's getting a monopoly on disinformation.

CJP said...

I totally agree with you, Ray Gun.

That's why Conservatives are America's Real Terrorists. The Conservative Hate Media is doing more damage to the minds of average Americans than Al Quaida and the Taliban put together could ever dream of doing.

Brandon said...

"That's why Conservatives are America's Real Terrorists."
-CJP

For a minute, after reading your previous post, I thought you were thinking logically. I guess I was wrong.

Brandon said...

"If an illegal immigrant went to court suing for the "equal protection of the laws", that person would have to provide his Social Security number."
-CJP

More than likely it would be a group that would sue on their behalf. Example: ACLU

Havent you noticed, how in Washington state its becoming easier and easier go do things without proving your citizenship?

Unemployment for example has a special number to call if "You are having difficulty proving your citizenship".

The fact is that our government likes illegals because they are trying to figure out ways to make it easier for them to vote.

Juansomefreestuff said...

RayGun I don't need pay for health care. I don't care if they fine me 750 dollars, I not paying. I will get my health care and all my girl friends will have babies for free. I am using some Americans SS just like always. Who you going to fine. You will pay Latinos health care and nothing you can do about it. I need to go get Viagra so I can make more babies, that for free to. Americans are stupid we will keep taking till the country is ours. Then you need learn Spanish. Ha I love dumb ass USA.

Anonymous said...

ok..for all of you out there who think that they wont give health care to illegals...your right. Instead, they are going to make the illegals, legal citizens. So your right in what you are saying but in fact what they are doing is absolutly perposterious. These people who came here illegally are criminals, they broke the law. but no one seems to care about that, in todays world we are more worried about whether or not our prisoners are comfortable rather that what they did to get there. These illegal immigrants if they want to be here should have to go back to Mexico or whereever else and come back here the right way, not just get to stay here cause they are here. With that logic if a broke into a football stadium through and opening in the fence and they found me without a ticket they wouldnt say "Oh well you did get in" no they would tell me to get the F out! If you watched even one of Beck's shows and researched what he says you would see how much truth he is speaking. Are some of his ideas radical? Sure. But i think they need to be in a time like this when there are so many radicals in the white house right now. If you dont believe me research it. Look at all of those people surrounding Obama, most of them are someway or another connected to socialism or communism but i guess that just what you want is for us to become a communist society, thats what some of them want.