Dick Cheney's Lies about President Obama
Dick Cheney's Loose Lips -- Democrats Blame GOP for politicizing attempted airline bombing
By Eugene Robinson -- The Washington Post -- Thursday, December 31, 2009:
It's pathetic to break a New Year's resolution before we even get to New Year's Day, but here I go. I had promised myself that I would do a better job of ignoring Dick Cheney's corrosive and nonsensical outbursts -- that I would treat them, more or less, like the pearls of wisdom one hears from homeless people sitting in bus shelters.
But he is a former vice president, which gives him a big stage for his histrionic Rottweiler-in-Winter act. It is never a good idea to let widely disseminated lies and distortions go unchallenged. And the shrill screed that Cheney unloosed Wednesday is so full of outright mendacity that, well, my resolution will have to wait.
In a statement to Politico, Cheney seemed to be trying to provide talking points for opponents of the Obama administration who -- incredibly -- would exploit the Christmas Day terrorist attack for political gain. Cheney's broadside opens with a big lie, which he then repeats throughout. It is as if he believes that saying something over and over again, in a loud enough voice, magically makes it so.
"As I've watched the events of the last few days it is clear once again that President Obama is trying to pretend we are not at war," Cheney begins.
Flat-Out Untrue.
The fact is that Obama has said many times that we are at war against terrorists. He said it as a candidate. He said it in his inaugural address: "Our nation is at war against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred." He has said it since.
As Cheney well knows, unless he has lost even the most tenuous grip on reality, Obama's commitment to warfare as an instrument in the fight against terrorism has won the president nothing but grief from the liberal wing of his party, with more certainly to come. Hasn't anyone told Cheney that Obama is sharply boosting troop levels in Afghanistan in an attempt to avoid losing a war that the Bush administration started but then practically abandoned?
Cheney knows this. But he goes on to use the big lie -- that Obama is "trying to pretend we are not at war" -- to bludgeon the administration on a host of specific issues. Here is the one that jumps out at me: The president, Cheney claims, "seems to think that if he closes Guantanamo and releases the hard-core al Qaeda-trained terrorists still there, we won't be at war."
Interesting that Cheney should bring that up, because it now seems clear that the man accused of trying to blow up Northwest Flight 253, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, was given training -- and probably the bomb itself, which involved plastic explosives sewn into his underwear -- by al-Qaeda operatives in Yemen. It happens that at least two men who were released from Guantanamo appear to have gone on to play major roles as al-Qaeda lieutenants in Yemen. Who let these dangerous people out of our custody? They were set free by the administration of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I think that the appointment of Janet Napolitano was another HUGE blunder on Obama's part. I am from Arizona, and as far as I hear, the people of Arizona are thankful to be rid of her, but she sucks in her current position (as she did as Gov of AZ) There was a collective sigh of relief from the people of Az, when she was taken from Az. (remember, it was Napolitano that said there was no longer a war on terror---it was a matter of "manmade disasters". Holy shit! What a tool!)Unfortunately, Obama has a policy of appointing the most inept and questionable people to put into his cabinet. Why is that? Why doesn't that bother you?
Instead of worrying about Sarah Palin (who the people of Alaska actually liked, and she did alot of good things for) and Dick Chenney, maybe you had better start worrying about who is at the helm right now. There were no "lies" spoken. The prisoners were released to Saudi Arabia under great pressure from your side (left)to be "nicer" to the prisoners. Should have never happened. Yeman should not be ignored.
I clearly remember Ollie North being grilled and ridiculed by Al Gore in 1987 during the Contra hearings about Bin Ladin. Your side didn't listen when North called him the most dangerous person on the face of the earth, and then Clinton went on to decline to accept him when the Sudan offered to monitor him or turn him over.
http://www.infowars.com/saved%20pages/Prior_Knowledge/Clinton_let_bin_laden.htm ---LA Times
Lets face it. Your side sucks, and makes BIG mistakes, too---but it is your mindset that is most disturbing. You guys don't seem to learn from the mistakes. Better to cover them up, blame Bush, re-write history, or simply ignore the facts all together.
If I'd go along with the conspiracy theories I'd say that tricky Dickey Cheney is one of those who may be involved in setting up terrorists acts and/or ideas.
With his past .... and thinking that waterboarding is not against the Geneva convention...... who is to know what Cheney's truth is all about?
Nah, the above sounds too much like science fiction isn't it? lol
Post a Comment