Well, now, just yesterday, Republicans were complaining that the Obama Administration was killing Taliban terrorists instead of capturing them and interrogating them for valuable military information. What will Republicans complain about today -- that Obama's forces captured Mullah Baradar instead of killing him?
The fact is that the Obama administration has made far more progress in one year in combating the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan than the Bush-Cheney administration made in eight years. The Bush-Cheney ill-advised foray into Iraq tied up our forces in the wrong country and paralyzed US efforts in the areas where Al Quaida was really concentrated.
Obama's intensive and superb diplomacy over the past year have made a new level of cooperation possible between the American and Pakistani militaries, which is now resulting in our current military successes.
Let us never forget the Bush-Cheney Lost Decade. Let us never cease to talk about it. Let us keep reminding the folks of what Hell awaits the American people if the Far Right ever regains power in this country.
Here's the latest news:
Afghan Taliban's second in command captured in Karachi
By Karen DeYoung -- The Washington Post -- Tuesday, February 16, 2010
The Afghan Taliban's second in command, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, was captured last week in Karachi during a joint operation by Pakistan's intelligence service and the CIA, according to U.S. and Pakistani sources.
Deputy to Taliban leader Mohammad Omar, Baradar has been considered by many to be in de facto control of the insurgent organization in recent years. His capture is by far the most important detention since the beginning of the war in Afghanistan in 2001 and the first known capture of a top-ranking insurgent during the Obama administration.
The sources, who would speak only on condition of anonymity about the highly secret operation, said that the information had been tightly held to prevent word leaking to other senior Taliban commanders while Baradar was being interrogated. They said the interrogation was being conducted jointly by Pakistani and U.S. intelligence officials and is seen as a major step forward in cooperation between the two services, which has been rocky in the past.
CIA officials have charged that Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate has maintained ties with senior Taliban figures and has not acted on U.S.-provided intelligence, and Pakistani officials have blamed the CIA for faulty cooperation.
Results of Baradar's questioning have been circulating in Washington since he was detained Wednesday. His capture was first reported Monday night on the New York Times's Web site.
The former deputy defense minister in the Taliban government in Afghanistan, Baradar has gradually taken control of the Taliban leadership council based in Quetta, Pakistan. "He makes the Taliban run," said Seth G. Jones, a senior political scientist at the Rand Corporation and Taliban expert who recently returned from an advisory position with the U.S. military command in Afghanistan.
Omar, Jones said, "tends to be fairly reclusive and unpolished. Baradar is the one who deals with the operational side."
Baradar ran many of the shuras, or conferences, involving senior Taliban commanders; controlled shadow governments in Afghanistan; and made many of the organization's day-to-day decisions. He is thought to have been responsible for a code of conduct distributed last year to field commanders, instructing them to use less brutal tactics in dealing with Afghan civilians in the Taliban's version of the "hearts and minds" campaign undertaken by the international military force there.
A member of the Popolzai tribe of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, Baradar was rumored last year to be involved in tentative reconciliation talks with the government, reports he denied in an e-mail interview with Newsweek magazine. "Not a single member of the Taliban is involved with talks," he said at the time.
"What would be the topic of the talks and what would be the result?" he said. "Our basic problem with the Americans is that they have attacked our country. They are offering talks, hoping that the mujahedin surrender before them." The basic condition for any dialogue, he said, "is the withdrawal of foreign forces from Afghanistan."
Published accounts in Afghanistan in December cited reports of disagreements between Baradar and Omar, saying that the No. 2 had made decisions over the appointments of military commanders inside Afghanistan without consulting the Taliban head.
According to an Interpol notice on Baradar, he was born in 1968 in Uruzgan province in south-central Afghanistan. Baradar is one of a number of senior Taliban officials on a U.N. sanctions list.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
Another setback???
We always knew our military would kick anybody's ass.
We want them to finish them off.
Libs didn't support surge, criticized our troops (Murtha, Durbin) and declared the war was lost (Harry Reid).
Democrats were the ones who didn't support troops.
Republicans know to just stay out of their way.
I applaud the military for getting this guy. I fully expect for them to get more no matter who is president.
The "surge" that the Democrats didn't support was in the wrong country -- a country that didn't attack us, had no WMD's, and shouldn't have been invaded in the first place. What in the world were we doing in Iraq to begin with?
All the Iraq War accomplished was to keep us from focusing our efforts on Osama Bin Laden and Al Quaida for seven years.
Now, Obama is finally doing what Bush and Cheney should have been doing from 9/11/01 until now. If Bush and Cheney had been doing the right thing, then this War against Al Quaida would probably have been over long by now.
For the past year, Obama has finally started to put our troops where they belong. At last, the Lost Decade is over, and we are starting to make real progress against Al Quaida. Thanks to Obama -- But No Thanks to Bush, Cheney and their fellow Cons.
CJP said...
The "surge" that the Democrats didn't support was in the wrong country -- a country that didn't attack us, had no WMD's, and shouldn't have been invaded in the first place. What in the world were we doing in Iraq to begin with?
Then why is Biden saying that Iraq is Obama's greatest legacy?
CJP said....
For the past year, Obama has finally started to put our troops where they belong.
Excellent observation. "Finally" is the correct word.
"Finally" as in he was so embarrassed at the delay to send help that he "finally" did what his generals asked and sent more troops.
Republicans know the military can do the job. I guess democrats don't.
Great job.
"What in the world were we doing in Iraq to begin with?"
Oil.
Oil==Money.
Money==God.
CJP said...
"What in the world were we doing in Iraq to begin with?"
Oil (Bush) and Halliburton (Cheney)
Oh grow up! Where is the oil? Huh? I want to know where all of this oil is that we have "taken" from Iraq!
Oh and Anon2---feel free to appoligise at any time for your stupid slavery statement
Great article
Here is an article from therealclearpoliticles.com which explains success in capturing second most powerful Taliban attritubuted to Gen. Mullen who was hired by Sec. Gates who was hired by President Obama. The article comes from the Republican site but they never admit the success of President Obama. All Republican media are downplaying this important news.
see:-
http://www.tnr.com/article/world/islamabad-boys
politicalpost, It does sound like the Tablibany captured is a really big deal. Time may tell...
politicalpost said...
Here is an article from therealclearpoliticles.com which explains success in capturing second most powerful Taliban attritubuted to Gen. Mullen who was hired by Sec. Gates who was hired by President Obama. The article comes from the Republican site but they never admit the success of President Obama. All Republican media are downplaying this important news.
You mean Sec Gates who asked for additional troops and was ignored for months?
Great capture and I applaud Obama for it.
Republicans always knew the military would always do the right thing even when democrats openly criticized them. Prominent dems like Durbin (russian gulags), Murtha (military killing innocent women and childre) and Reid (we have lost the war)gave comfort to enemies.
I'm not sure who is "downplaying" the news because it's a top story all over the news including FOX.
Post a Comment