From Salon -- TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 2010:
Why healthcare reform could work for Democrats now.Passing the healthcare bill may mean it's no longer weighing down Democrats -- and GOP repeal plans may help, too
BY MIKE MADDEN
(Rep. Michelle Bachmann, R-Minn., talks about her opposition to the health care reform bill during a press conference on Sunday).
WASHINGTON -- About six weeks before the November elections, insurance companies will be legally prohibited from dropping coverage for patients when they get sick. They'll be required to offer policies to children with preexisting medical conditions. Parents will be able to keep their kids on their own insurance until those kids turn 26. And lifetime caps on how much an insurance provider will pay for your care will go out the window.
All that will take effect six months after President Obama signs the healthcare reform bill into law -- which he's doing Tuesday morning at the White House, thanks to the House passage Sunday night of the landmark legislation. Many of the bill's changes to the healthcare system are years off -- but not all of them. Some of the most popular provisions in the legislation will be active far sooner, just in time for the elections.
Which is why some Democrats are practically begging Republicans to make repealing the healthcare law the centerpiece of the fall campaign, the way top GOP leaders have promised to do. Sure, polls now show voters are upset with the way the legislative process worked, and in some districts, they're really angry about it. But the legislation will probably never be as unpopular once it's law as it was when it was being endlessly debated. When no one from the federal government shows up to kill Granny the day after the law is enacted, after all, it's going to be a lot harder to scare people about "death panels."
"You saw it with the Republicans, when they passed the prescription drug plan," said Democratic pollster John Anzalone. "There was a net opposition when that was voted in, and then within six months -- way before any benefits started to accrue -- there was a net support for it ... [The healthcare bill] is never going to get any less popular. It only has room to improve."
Some of the opposition to the bill isn't even the kind of opposition the GOP is banking on in November. Thirteen percent of the people against the bill in a CNN poll out Monday said they thought it wasn't liberal enough; those voters aren't likely to get on board for repealing it. The same poll showed 51 percent of respondents trust President Obama to handle major changes in the healthcare system, compared to 39 percent who trust Republicans in Congress.
But the GOP is already revving up the repeal platform. Rep. Mark Kirk, the Republican candidate for Senate in Illinois, promised last week -- even before the bill passed -- to "lead the effort" to get rid of it. Not wanting to waste a moment, Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., introduced legislation Monday to repeal the bill; clocking in comfortably at under a page (in fact, only 75 words!), Bachmann's legislation is obviously far more American than the 2,074-page version the Democrats cooked up. Nearly 200 Republican candidates, and 49 GOP lawmakers, have already signed a pledge by the anti-tax Club for Growth to "rescue America from government-run healthcare."
Forget for a moment that repealing the bill next year would require Republicans to pick up 41 seats in the House to get a majority (possible, but not likely) and 19 seats in the Senate to get the repeal legislation past a filibuster (impossible, with only 16 Democratic-held seats up for grabs this fall), as well as do something about the guy in the White House who would veto the plan. It would also require the GOP to tell seniors they no longer get the $250 rebate, which they will get this year, to offset the Medicare prescription drug "donut hole"; convince small businesses to give up tax credits, also available this year, that offset up to 35 percent of the cost of healthcare premiums for their workers; persuade parents that insurance companies should be able to deny coverage for kids with preexisting conditions; and get everyone in the country on board with bringing back absurdly low annual limits on what insurance companies will pay for. Plus tell 30 million uninsured Americans that they won't be getting access to healthcare in a few years, as planned. All that might be a tough sell even at a tea party convention.
"It frames them as just an angry 'no' party," said Democratic strategist Chris Kofinis. "Repeal is not a solution to healthcare problems."
That's not to say Republicans will be playing defense this fall. Some Democrats -- like freshman Rep. Betsy Markey, of Colorado -- could well lose their seats because of the vote. And if the White House and key Democratic allies don't do a good job of explaining what the bill will do, voters will still listen to GOP attacks.
"I think it's comical that the Democrats think they can sell the benefits of healthcare reform only after the debate is over," said Republican strategist Alex Conant. "Remember, it's not as if this legislation was popular before all the backroom deals were made -- to the contrary, its unpopularity was why they needed to make the backroom deals! If they can't sell this when people are paying close attention, then how do they expect to sell it when people's attention shifts to the economy?"
Still, the White House isn't planning to sit back just because the House passed the bill. (For one thing, the Senate still needs to pass a budget reconciliation measure to amend the bill.) Obama will head to Iowa City, Iowa -- where he rolled out his healthcare policy in 2007, in the early days of the presidential campaign -- on Thursday, to talk about the bill's benefits. And aides say they're ready to defend it.
"If people want to campaign on taking tax cuts away from small businesses, taking assistance away from seniors getting prescription drugs, and want to take away a mother knowing that their child can't be discriminated against by an insurance company -- if that's the platform that others want to run on, taking that away from families and small businesses, then we'll have a robust campaign on that," press secretary Robert Gibbs said Monday.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
17 comments:
I'm really puzzled as why this is called Health Care Reform.
The proper name should be Health INSURANCE Reform.
The health insurance co's will have over 30 million new customer to bilk money from.
"On Sunday evening the richest, most powerful country in the world, the USA, finally entered the 20th century. Yes, not the 21st century, but the 20th,"
Time
Comon cons, lets join the jet age. Comon cons lets move out of the dark age. Comon cons, let go of the past.
Amen... Let Go crazy cons, just let go. See it for what it is.
"The health insurance co's will have over 30 million new customer to bilk money from."---Anon2
Finally. We agree on something, Anon2. That is exactly what I have been saying. Don't think the "cons" are in the back pocket of the insurance companies on this one. Looks to me like the Progressives have favored the insurance companies. Even with a few concessions, the insurance companies will be writing more policies than ever, and have the IRS to enforce this!
Caseyboy said...
"Finally. We agree on something, Anon2."
Not so fast caseyboy. This bill is better than nothing. In return more people will be insured and less will die due to lack of health care.
Single payer would have been the best. The Dems made a mistake by dropping that option prematurely before the fight really began.
I sincerely hope and wish that the single payer plan will be introduced in a not too distant future so that the USA will be able to join the civilized countries who DO have that plan.
"I sincerely hope and wish that the single payer plan will be introduced in a not too distant future so that the USA will be able to join the civilized countries who DO have that plan."---Anon2
Still trying to figure out why you give a shit. You aren't here. You really don't know the story. Maybe misery loves company...
"Still trying to figure out why you give a shit. "
JHC, Case, I think she cares, as she lives in Canada, what the giant is doing next to her.
I don't know, RG. Do you spend your spare time following Canada's politics? Either Canada is extremely boring, or she does this on her laptop while waiting in line for healthcare, or deep inside, she wishes she was an American. I can only thank God that she isn't. She says the most vile things about this country, but I think that it just might be the geographical equivalent of "penis envy"
"penis envy", I think all girls have it to some point, if for no other reason it makes it easier to pee on things.
I don't remember any vile things about this country coming from A2. "Cons are war mongers" is hardly vile.
Yes, it would be nice to be able to pee standing up!
You have a short memory. She is constantly ragging on America for slavery, etc. She is the Queen of the America stomp. Sometimes I am pretty shocked that I am the only one that sticks up for this country. You may be disappointed at some things, you may not like everything, you may want to change alot of things, but America is the country that has made you money, given you opportunity, and allowed you your freedom. It isn't perfect, but it is far from horrible and you need to stand up for it once in a while. If that makes me cheezy than too bad.
"but America is the country that has made you money, given you opportunity, and allowed you your freedom."
I have no problem with the US. I just want to make it better. Cons want to go back to the founding fathers days. Blood letting, slavery, no women's rights, you know, the good ol days.
That is so silly. Right. Conservatives want to go back to slavery? Bloodletting? How can I even take you seriously?
Did you ever pick up the book "Give me a Break" by John Stossel? No. Sure you have no interest. Too bad. It shows the best examples of the Federal Government at work. But I don't think that you want your bubble burst.
"How can I even take you seriously?"
Cons have father fixations. Their Father in heaven, the founding fathers, and their paternal fathers. Maybe you should go read some Sigmund Freud :-)
John Stoogel:
"I'm a little embarrassed about how long it took me to see the folly of most government intervention. It was probably 15 years before I really woke up to the fact that almost everything government attempts to do, it makes worse."
Why aren't the Canadian banks having any trouble? Why are most banks in the world having trouble and not the Canadians?
"In the midst of the enormous economic crisis, I think Canada has shown itself to be a pretty good manager of the financial system and the economy in ways that we haven't always been," Barack Obama told CBC News.
Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2009/03/03/f-canada-banks.html#ixzz0jIIN5C8i
What are you talking about? Canada is having problems too. Look it up!
"The first two months of 2009 were a disaster for working people; 240,000 workers lost their jobs. The job losses in January were the largest monthly loss ever in Canada. November to February losses are the steepest since the crushing recession of 1981/82.
Since June of 2008, Canadian households have lost 8% of their net worth. Household credit debt grew by 2% in the fourth quarter of 2008."--
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12945
There are scores of articles on this. They may not be hurting as much as we are, but they are not doing well.
You believe it because Obama said it? That's funny, RG, since Obama has proven to be a big liar.
So, you have a nickname for Stossel? Figures. Still haven't read the book. You need to have more than an paragraph quotation to discredit him. Fact is, he has done the research, and he did it while he was still a liberal. Why are you so afraid---oh yeah, there is that bubble...
Banks, numb skull. Canadian Banks are having very little trouble, because they are regulated by an supposedly incompetent government, as according to Stogill, all governments always makes things worse.
"Obama has proven to be a big liar."
Now, that's a Very Big Lie on your part, Casey. I hope your nose didn't grow longer.
Where and when did Obama lie ------ about anything?
Post a Comment