Thursday, August 19, 2010

Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin are Osama Bin Laden's Best Friends and Allies

From The Washington Post -- August 18, 2010:

Mosque fight helps al-Qaeda, says former FBI interrogator

By Jeff Stein

Ali Soufan, reputed to be the FBI’s most skillful terrorist interrogator after the Sept. 11 attacks, asserted Wednesday that opposition to building a mosque near Ground Zero is helping al-Qaeda.

“There are many reasons for supporting the Muslim community's right to build a cultural center and mosque on private property, not least of all the First Amendment of the Constitution guaranteeing freedom of religion,” wrote Soufan, a supervisory special agent with the bureau from 1997 to 2005, in an essay for Forbes and published online Wednesday.

“But from a national security perspective, our leaders need to understand that no one is likely to be happier with the opposition to building a mosque than Osama Bin Laden. His next video script has just written itself.”

Soufan, a Muslim himself who cracked some of al-Qaeda’s top operatives by rejecting harsh interrogation methods, noted that no American Muslims participated in the Sept. 11 plot.

But the current opposition to the mosque, mixed with “poor (and even harmful) leadership within the American-Muslim community and failed strategies from our government in dealing with the [terrorist] threat,” could be undermining young American Muslims’ support for their country.

“When demagogues appear to be equating Islam with terrorism, it's making young Muslims unsure about their place in the country,” he wrote. “It bolsters the message that radicalizers are selling: That the war is against Islam, and Muslims are not welcome in America.”

The proposal to build an Islamic center four blocks from a hole where the World Trade Center once stood in Lower Manhattan has fueled a Web-based furor driven by conservative activists, now joined by some influential Republicans and Democrats.

President Obama inserted himself into the debate, saying last week that the project has the right to go forward. Since then, the White House has been struggling to contain the domestic political fallout, but so far seems little concerned about the effects on the Muslim world.

“As President, what President Obama can do is make sure that we communicate exactly how we're feeling to the Muslim world, and we're focused on that,” Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton told reporters Aug. 12. “But I don't think that the boundaries are shifting in such way that that's dangerous.”

A half-century ago, another Democrat in the White House was slow to apprehend the threat of civil rights resistance to his foreign policy.

President John F. Kennedy was at first enraged by the sit-ins and "Freedom Rides," seeing them as undermining his ability to deal with Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev.

But events, particularly the images of white cops unleashing attack dogs on black demonstrators in Birmingham, Ala., caused him to change.

“What a disaster that picture is,” Kennedy moaned. “That picture is not only in America but all around the world.”

Kennedy’s eventual support of civil rights legislation was inextricably linked with America's struggle against Soviet-backed liberation movements.

"We preach freedom around the world, and we mean it, and we cherish our freedom here at home," he said in a major speech in 1963, "but are we to say to the world, and much more importantly, to each other, that this is the land of the free except for the Negroes; that we have no second-class citizens except Negroes; that we have no class or caste system, no ghettoes, no master race except with respect to Negroes?"

Likewise, Soufan argued that inflammatory rhetoric against the mosque proposal and the struggle for the Muslim minds around the world are linked.

“The potential damage to our national security is not only to our work abroad," he maintained, "but at home too.”

“Some young Muslims are finding themselves increasingly isolated and marginalized -- and are becoming easy prey for radicals."

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

"That the war is against Islam, and Muslims are not welcome in America"

Why can't we agree that the war IS against Islam but that Muslims are welcome in America?

To go to one extreme and demonize ever Muslim one comes across and restrict their civil rights as citizens is repugnant.

But it is not necessary to go to the other extreme and pretend that Islam has not declared war on us, or worse to BLAME America's (rightful) mistrust and fear of Islam to be the CAUSE of 'young radicals' joining 'the cause'.

It is not an extreme branch of Islam that interprets the West as 'evil' and considers any part of the world not under Muslim control as being part of the 'sphere of war' (Dar al Ismam). It is FUNDAMENTAL Islam.

We don't do anyone justice, least of all ourselves when we embrace either the far-right black & white stance (all muslims are bad) or the far-left (islam is a religion of peace and it is the west's behavior that causes the problems).

Anonymous said...

Calling the center 'Cordoba' and then having liberals repeat the mantra over and over that the name reflects a golden age of cooperation between Muslims, Jews and Christians is quite frankly disgusting.

It is like building an American Cultural Center on an Indian Reservation and calling it 'Plymouth Rock' to celebrate the cooperation between the native americans and the settlers.

Cordoba was conquered (as was the entire arabian peninsula, persia, anatolia, constantinople, north africa and the entire iberian pensinsula) by sword. Muslims rode in on horseback and slaughtered, the church elders tried to escape with invaluable Holy Christian relics and were ridden down and slaughtered, their heads packed in camphor and sent back to Baghdad, the relics melted down for gold.

The citizens were given the same choice Islam gave everyone else in the world (except the 80,000,000 Indians they killed); give up their land and country, be ruled by Islam, pay a tax, convert or die.

THAT is the history of Cordoba and no one who knows it's history mistakes the meaning behind the name the Imam proposes.