From Common Dreams -- November 8, 2010:
A Recipe for Fascism
by Chris Hedges
American politics, as the midterm elections demonstrated, have descended into the irrational. On one side stands a corrupt liberal class, bereft of ideas and unable to respond coherently to the collapse of the global economy, the dismantling of our manufacturing sector and the deadly assault on the ecosystem. On the other side stands a mass of increasingly bitter people whose alienation, desperation and rage fuel emotionally driven and incoherent political agendas. It is a recipe for fascism.
More than half of those identified in a poll by the Republican-leaning Rasmussen Reports as "mainstream Americans" now view the tea party favorably. The other half, still grounded in a reality-based world, is passive and apathetic. The liberal class wastes its energy imploring Barack Obama and the Democrats to promote sane measures including job creation programs, regulation as well as criminal proceedings against the financial industry, and an end to our permanent war economy. Those who view the tea party favorably want to tear the governmental edifice down, with the odd exception of the military and the security state, accelerating our plunge into a nation of masters and serfs. The corporate state, unchallenged, continues to turn everything, including human beings and the natural world, into commodities to exploit until exhaustion or collapse.
All sides of the political equation are lackeys for Wall Street. They sanction, through continued deregulation, massive corporate profits and the obscene compensation and bonuses for corporate managers. Most of that money-hundreds of billions of dollars-is funneled upward from the U.S. Treasury. The Sarah Palins and the Glenn Becks use hatred as a mobilizing passion to get the masses, fearful and angry, to call for their own enslavement as well as to deny uncomfortable truths, including global warming. Our dispossessed working class and beleaguered middle class are vulnerable to this manipulation because they can no longer bear the chaos and uncertainty that come with impoverishment, hopelessness and loss of control. They have retreated into a world of illusion, one peddled by right-wing demagogues, which offers a reassuring emotional consistency. This consistency appears to protect them from the turmoil in which they have been forced to live. The propaganda of a Palin or a Beck may insult common sense, but, for a growing number of Americans, common sense has lost its validity.
The liberal class, which remains rooted in a world of fact, rationalizes placating corporate power as the only practical response. It understands the systems of corporate power. It knows the limitations and parameters. And it works within them. The result, however, is the same. The entire spectrum of the political landscape collaborates in the strangulation of our disenfranchised working class, the eroding of state power, the criminal activity of the financial class and the paralysis of our political process.
Commerce cannot be the sole guide of human behavior. This utopian fantasy, embraced by the tea party as well as the liberal elite, defies 3,000 years of economic history. It is a chimera. This ideology has been used to justify the disempowerment of the working class, destroy our manufacturing capacity, and ruthlessly gut social programs that once protected and educated the working and middle class. It has obliterated the traditional liberal notion that societies should be configured around the common good. All social and cultural values are now sacrificed before the altar of the marketplace.
The failure to question the utopian assumptions of globalization has left us in an intellectual vacuum. Regulations, which we have dismantled, were the bulwarks that prevented unobstructed brutality and pillaging by the powerful and protected democracy. It was a heavily regulated economy, as well as labor unions and robust liberal institutions, which made the American working class the envy of the industrialized world. And it was the loss of those unions, along with a failure to protect our manufacturing, which transformed this working class into a permanent underclass clinging to part-time or poorly paid jobs without protection or benefits.
The "inevitability" of globalization has permitted huge pockets of the country to be abandoned economically. It has left tens of millions of Americans in economic ruin. Private charity is now supposed to feed and house the newly minted poor, a job that once, the old liberal class argued, belonged to the government. As John Ralston Saul in "The Collapse of Globalization" points out, "the role of charity should be to fill the cracks of society, the imaginative edges, to go where the public good hasn't yet focused or can't. Dealing with poverty is the basic responsibility of the state." But the state no longer has the interest or the resources to protect us. And the next target slated for elimination is Social Security.
That human society has an ethical foundation that must be maintained by citizens and the state is an anathema to utopian ideologues of all shades. They always demand that we sacrifice human beings for a distant goal. The propagandists of globalization-from Lawrence Summers to Francis Fukuyama to Thomas Friedman-do for globalization and the free market what Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky did for Marxism. They sell us a dream. These elite interpreters of globalism are the vanguard, the elect, the prophets, who alone grasp a great absolute truth and have the right to impose this truth on a captive people no matter what the cost. Human suffering is dismissed as the price to be paid for the coming paradise. The response of these propagandists to the death rattles around them is to continue to speak in globalization's empty rhetoric and use state resources to service a dead system. They lack the vision to offer any alternative. They can function only as systems managers. They will hollow out the state to sustain a casino capitalism that is doomed to fail. And what they offer as a solution is as irrational as the visions of a Christian America harbored by many within the tea party.
We are ruled by huge corporate monopolies that replicate the political and economic power, on a vastly expanded scale, of the old trading companies of the 17th and 18th centuries. Wal-Mart's gross annual revenues of $250 billion are greater than those of most small nation-states. The political theater funded by the corporate state is composed of hypocritical and impotent liberals, the traditional moneyed elite, and a disenfranchised and angry underclass that is being encouraged to lash out at the bankrupt liberal institutions and the government that once protected them. The tea party rabble, to placate their anger, will also be encouraged by their puppet masters to attack helpless minorities, from immigrants to Muslims to homosexuals. All these political courtiers, however, serve the interests of the corporate state and the utopian ideology of globalism. Our social and political ethic can be summed up in the mantra let the market decide. Greed is good.
The old left-the Wobblies, the Congress of Industrial Workers (CIO), the Socialist and Communist parties, the fiercely independent publications such as Appeal to Reason and The Masses-would have known what to do with the rage of our dispossessed. It used anger at injustice, corporate greed and state repression to mobilize Americans to terrify the power elite on the eve of World War I. This was the time when socialism was not a dirty word in America but a promise embraced by millions who hoped to create a world where everyone would have a chance. The steady destruction of the movements of the left was carefully orchestrated. They fell victim to a mixture of sophisticated forms of government and corporate propaganda, especially during the witch hunts for communists, and overt repression. Their disappearance means we lack the vocabulary of class warfare and the militant organizations, including an independent press, with which to fight back.
We believe, like the Spaniards in the 16th century who pillaged Latin America for gold and silver, that money, usually the product of making and trading goods, is real. The Spanish empire, once the money ran out and it no longer produced anything worth buying, went up in smoke. Today's use in the United States of some $12 trillion in government funds to refinance our class of speculators is a similar form of self-deception. Money markets are still treated, despite the collapse of the global economy, as a legitimate source of trade and wealth creation. The destructive power of financial bubbles, as well as the danger of an unchecked elite, was discovered in ancient Athens and detailed more than a century ago in Emile Zola's novel "Money." But we seem determined to find out this self-destructive force for ourselves. And when the second collapse comes, as come it must, we will revisit wrenching economic and political tragedies forgotten in the mists of history.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
20 comments:
Great article.
"And when the second collapse comes, as come it must, we will revisit wrenching economic and political tragedies forgotten in the mists of history."
Yes the cons are certainly of the fascist persuasion.
Does the below exemplify the beliefs of 99 percent of the tea-bagging cons that come to mind?
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/fasci14chars.html
Raygun, I agree an excellent article.
When will people learn from history??
Feudal system of the middle ages never really went away.
Too bad that the rethugliteakkklans don't see that due to their brainwashed peabrains.
Teabaggers:
Read what Fascism means and get the info from the link below and NOT from your Faux News Entertainment contributors such as Beck, Palin etc.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Fascism
"Private charity is now supposed to feed and house the newly minted poor, a job that once, the old liberal class argued, belonged to the government."
Where does it say ANYWHERE that the role of our government is to "take care of us"? It is the role of our government to protect us from enemies, but I dont recall anywhere in the constitution where they are to provide for us!
Big problem with the premise of this article. Facism requires BIGGER government. How is it that the majority of the population is calling for SMALLER government? We are not in danger of falling into Facism as long as we follow the Constitution.
uhhh....I think that's the whole idea about not straying too far from our constitution.
"Where does it say ANYWHERE that the role of our government is to "take care of us"? "
Preamble:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Welfare
welfare n. 1. health, happiness, or prosperity; well-being. [<ME wel faren, to fare well] Source: AHD
Welfare in today's context also means organized efforts on the part of public or private organizations to benefit the poor, or simply public assistance. ***This is not the meaning of the word as used in the Constitution.
(The Constitutional Dictionary)
And if that is not enough evidence of the intent, you can go into the document and try to find where it sets up provisions for "providing for" or "feeding and housing" it's citizens.
Without the government stepping in to look after some of the weak ones in the society (not THEIR fault) the USA would already be a much worse banana republic.
I am SURE that not even ONE Rethugteakkklan would take care of their neighbors in need.
Private charity is a thing of the past due to avarice and unbridled greed by most members of this so-called "civilized" society. It's all about ME....ME...ME, especially the Rethugteakkklans.
Reagan told the American people that GREED IS GOOD and so a new era of unbridled greed of the common folk took off. It took/takes the form of consumerism in its worst. Therefore, no crumbs left for the needy.
"Private charity is a thing of the past due to avarice and unbridled greed by most members of this so-called "civilized" society."
1. United States - $28.67 billion
2. France - $12.43 billion
3. Germany - $11.98 billion
4. United Kingdom - $11.50 billion
5. Japan - $9.48 billion
6. Spain - $6.57 billion
7. Netherlands - $6.43 billion
8. Sweden - $4.55 billion
9. Norway - $4.09 billion
10. Canada - $4.01 billion
11. Italy - $3.31 billion
12. Denmark - $2.81 billion
13. Australia - $2.76 billion
14. Belgium - $2.60 billion
15. Switzerland - $2.31 billion
16. Finland - $1.29 billion
17. Austria - $1.15 billion
18. Ireland - $1.00 billion
19. South Korea - $0.82 billion
20. Greece - $0.61 billion
21. Portugal - $0.51 billion
22. Luxembourg - $0.40 billion
23. New Zealand - $0.31 billion
"U.S. private companies lead the world in two CSR initiatives: donating to community causes and charities (94%) and participating in community activities (82%)."
Grant Thorton International Survey
Obviously you have not researched this you Marxist tool!
Why don't you Google stuff before you flap your lips and use your boney fingers to type your tripe.
And by the way, stupid: it was Gordon Gecko from Wall Street that said "greed is good". And a tip for you, because I don't think you really know the difference anymore...Gordon Gecko WASN'T a REAL PERSON.
Another tip: I don't live in a Banana Republic. I have a nice house that is warm in the winter and cool in the summer. I have food on the table and satellite TV. I drive a beautiful late model Honda and live only blocks from the beach. My lifestyle is really great and I bet that bugs the Hell out of you, doesn't it? I also work with my Church, gettng donations from those terrible greedy corporations that give so much and so freely that they don't even ask for reciepts for their generous donations!
"Feudal system of the middle ages never really went away."
-Anon2
The liberals are this blog keep making comments similiar to this one but I have to ask...
"Is it true, that the problems of that time period were created by GOVERNMENT?"
BTW---in case I wasn't clear---those figures on that chart were the stats on charitible contributions by country! Notice the US is #1. Where's Canada? Oops~! It's #10.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_charitable_countries
Dumb broad Caseyboy
One has to take in account the number of people of each country and the total $$ amount in charity to derive at a percentage.
$$ amount without quoting the number of inhabitants those countries don't mean anything.
You in the USA got 10 times more inhabitants than here in Canada. LOL That makes the outcome in your generosity far different isn't it? LOL
Example:
USA - abt 300+ million inhabitants
Total in charities: $28.67 billion
the Netherlands - abt 16 million inhabitants
Total in charities: $6.43 billion
etc. etc.
Who is the most generous? DO Your math Bitch.
""Private charity is a thing of the past due to avarice and unbridled greed by most members of this so-called "civilized" society."
-Anon2
The only ones who can donate money are the ones with money. STOP TAXING THE HELL OUT OF EVERYONE!
Why do liberals think ass backwards? Lets raise taxes so tax payers will donate less, then raise taxes higher because charities are no longer taking care of the poor.
Lets increase the costs of health insurance(OBAMACARE), then complain that insurance is to expensive. Then suggest a complete government take over and raise taxes, again!
Raygun, CJP or Anon2
Can either one of you give me an example of someone who can not make it on their own, with our current social program system?
Who CANT buy health insurance?
Who CANT feed their family?
Who NEEDS a place to sleep?
...and dont confuse "Doesnt want to" with "CANT"!
"Who is the most generous? DO Your math Bitch."
Damn Case, another foreign fan.
"Then suggest a complete government take over"
Amen, now you are talking, the prices will certainly come down.
"Can either one of you give me an example of someone who can not make it on their own, with our current social program system?
Who CANT buy health insurance?
Who CANT feed their family?
Who NEEDS a place to sleep?"
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-05-04-new-homeless_N.htm
Google for tent cities in the USA and you'll find dozens of links.
You probably would find that "normal" living, you egoistical maniac.
Another example of tent cities and don't you dare saying that Obama did this. The article is from 2008.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26776283/
"Amen, now you are talking, the prices will certainly come down."
-Raygun
Government has already driven the costs up!
"You probably would find that "normal" living, you egoistical maniac."
-Anon2
I really have a hard time feeling sorry for these people. They qualify for dozens of social programs including housing. Maybe we should go thru and kick out those worthless pieces of shit living in low income housing who refuse to make any attempt to move on.
Get a clue, Anon2! Everything we need to help the poor is already available, we just need to do some reform so the POOR actually get the help, not the free loaders!
Like I said before, can you give me an example? I want specifics: Income, family, job and so on.
Post a Comment