Tuesday, November 23, 2010

The Total Ignorance of Sarah Palin

From The Washington Post -- November 23, 2010:

Attack on Michelle Obama shows Palin's Ignorance of History

By Richard Cohen

When I was 11, my father thought it was time to show my sister and me the nation's capital. I have only vague memories of that trip - the heat, the expanse of the White House's grounds, the Jefferson Memorial. I do remember we took Route 1 through Baltimore (no I-95 yet) and it was there that I saw my first sign with the word "colored" on it - a rooming house, I think. This was 1952, and the United States was an apartheid nation.

It is Sarah Palin who brings back these memories. In her new book, she reportedly takes Michelle Obama to task for her supposedly infamous remark from the 2008 campaign: "For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback." Instantly, Republicans pounced. Among the first to do so was Cindy McCain, who said, "I have and always will be proud of my country." It was a cheap shot, but her husband's selection of Palin for the ticket and plenty of cheap shots from Palin ("death panels," etc.) were yet to come.

Michelle Obama quickly explained herself. She was proud of the turnout in the primaries - so many young people, etc. Evan Thomas, writing perceptively in Newsweek, thought - as I did - that she was saying something else. He dug into her senior thesis at Princeton - "Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community" - to find a young woman who felt, or was made to feel, "more aware of my 'blackness' than ever before." This was not a statement of racism. This was a statement of fact.

It's appalling that Palin and too many others fail to understand that fact - indeed so many facts of American history. They don't offer the slightest hint that they can appreciate the history of the Obama family and that in Michelle's case, her ancestors were slaves - Jim Robinson of South Carolina, her paternal great-great grandfather, being one. Even after they were freed they were consigned to peonage, second-class citizens, forbidden to vote in much of the South, dissuaded from doing so in some of the North, relegated to separate schools, restaurants, churches, hotels, waiting rooms of train stations, the back of the bus, the other side of the tracks, the mortuary, the cemetery and, if whites could manage it, heaven itself.

It was the government that oppressed blacks, enforcing the laws that imprisoned them and hanged them for crimes grave and trivial, whipped them if they bolted for freedom and, in the Civil War, massacred them if they were captured fighting for the North. And yet if African Americans hesitate in embracing the mythical wonderfulness of America, they are accused of racism - of having the gall to know more about their own experience and history than Palin and others think they should.

Why do politicians such as Palin and commentators such as Glenn Beck insist that African Americans go blank on their own history - as blank as apparently Palin and Beck are themselves? Why must they insist that blacks join them in embracing a repellent history that once caused America to go to war with itself? Besides Princeton, Michelle Obama is a graduate of Harvard Law School. It's hardly possible that she is not knowledgeable about the history of African Americans - no Ellis Island for them, immigrants in their colorful native dress waving at the camera. Should she forget it all simply because she went to Ivy League schools - be thankful for what she had gotten and the hell with the rest? Why should she be more grateful than Cindy McCain?

Sarah Palin teases that she might run for president. But she is unqualified - not just in the (let me count the) usual ways, but because she does not know the country. She could not be the president of black America nor of Hispanic America. She knows more about grizzlies than she does about African Americans - and she clearly has more interest in the former than the latter. Did she once just pick up the phone and ask Michelle Obama what she meant by her remark? Did she ask about her background? What it was like at Princeton? What it was like for her parents or her grandparents? I can offer a hint. If they were driving to Washington, they slowed down and stopped where the sign said "colored" - and the irritated Palins of the time angrily hit the horn and went on their way.

20 comments:

Casey said...

What a stupid article! the truth of the matter is, that she should have been proud of her country, because she could go to Princeton! She should have been proud that so many Americans---to include white people---gave their lives to make sure that slavery was abolished, and that this country came so far that a black man could run for President! How about being proud that your country took on Nazis and freed parts of Europe---at a cost of American lives. She should have been proud of her country that so many Americans are willing to give so freely, to free others or to help others! As Oprah Winfrey says, "only in America, I could I have become what I am today" She should have been proud of that!
I know a lot of African Americans and 99.9% of them are hard working, patriotic Americans. Yes, they are proud.
Our history is not pretty--not all of it. However somewhere we have forgotten (or were never taught) that other countries had slavery, and had terrible racial practices of discrimination and hatred. Yet few have done as many positive things in this world, or taken in as many! We have grown and it is to our credit that we have. I am proud of that.
No, this doesn't fit into your view our country---you would rather condemn it!

CJP said...

I would rather Improve it.

We may have come a long way, but we still have a long way to go.

Patting ourselves on the back doesn't accomplish much.

Recognizing our problems and taking positive steps to overcome them is the proper way to make this a better country for all of us.

CJP

Anonymous said...

"What a stupid article! the truth of the matter is, that she should have been proud of her country, because she could go to Princeton! She should have been proud that so many Americans---to include white people---gave their lives to make sure that slavery was abolished, and that this country came so far that a black man could run for President! "

The above comments made by Casey sounds like racism to me.

Casey said...

"The above comments made by Casey sounds like racism to me."---Anon2 (going under Anonymous)

That isn't racism, stupid. That is truth. We have come a long way in our evolution of thought. I am proud that she could go to Princeton. I am PROUD that my Native American grandmother was able to leave the reservation and get a college education and become an RN.
It is hard to imagine, but people are limited to the experiences that they have in life. We are living in a completely different world than they did 100 years ago. Easy to look back from our perspective and judge the people of 100 years ago! Was it evil? Yes, partly and in some. Was it ignorance? Yes, mostly.
Yes, we do need to pat ourselves on the back. We do need to recongnize our progress. We have come a long way and we continue to move forward. It is evolution of thought.

Casey said...

Anon2: this is for you. You are so quick to call people racist, I thought that maybe you needed the definition of the word:
- based on racism: based on prejudices and stereotypes related to race
- prejudiced against other races: prejudiced against all people who belong to other races
- racist person: somebody who hates others who are not of his or her own race

Now. You tell me WHERE I am a racist---and you can kiss my ass.

Anonymous said...

"Recent American right-wing terrorists include:
The Hutaree: Nine members of the Christian militia group, which said it's preparing for the arrival of the Anti-Christ, plotted to mass-murder police officers in 2010.
James Von Brunn: The 88-year-old neo-Nazi murdered an African-American guard at the Holocaust Museum in Washington DC in June 2009. His writings expressed support for Birtherism and praised Sarah Palin.
Richard Poplawski: The Pittsburgh man shot and killed three police officers in April 2009, telling friends he feared that President Obama planned to confiscate weapons. He expressed fear about a supposed plan by FEMA to herd people into concentration camps, which he had seen discussed by Glenn Beck on Fox News.
John Patrick Bedell: He shot two Pentagon police officers before being mortally wounded himself. In an online video manifesto, Bedell had ranted about the government's ability to "confiscate the resources of their citizens to fund schemes that need only be justified by lies and deception."
Joshua Cartwright: This Florida man killed two sheriff's deputies at a gun range in April 2009 before police officers killed him. His wife told police he was "severely disturbed" by Obama's election.
John Gimbel: This California man was charged in October 2009 after sending a racist, profanity-filled email that called for the death of President Obama and for the murders of Michelle Obama and the couple's two children "in front of" the president.
Steven Anderson: The Phoenix pastor told his congregation during the summer of 2009 to "pray for Barack Obama to die and go to hell." The next day, one of his congregants showed up at an Obama event with an assault rifle and a handgun.
Greg Girard: This Tea Party activist was charged in February 2010 with stockpiling weapons, and possessing explosive devices including tear gas and pepper ball canisters. Girard had recently written online that Sarah Palin is on a "righteous mission from God."
Norman LeBoon: This Philadelphia man was charged in March 2010 with threatening to kill Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) in a profanity-strewn Youtube video. LeBoon also posted previous videos making threats against Obama, Nancy Pelosi and other leaders.
Larry North: An East Texas man who federal prosecutors allege left explosive devices including pipe bombs in multiple area mail boxes was motivated in part by anger at the government, federal prosecutors said in April 2010.
Jerry Kane: In May 2010, two police officers pulled over a white van in West Memphis, Arkansas, for a traffic stop, and the driver opened fire with an AK-47, killing the officers. The driver of the van was Jerry Kane, who traveled the country giving a debt-elimination seminar and had recently spoken of killing IRS agents and being stopped at a "Nazi checkpoint" in New Mexico."

CJP said...

A great compilation, Anonymous. Thank you for sending it in.

Anonymous said...

The US of A is the laughing stock of the whole world. They hear and watch what's going on in that crazy land of make belief in peace and prosperity. Promoting peace is so hypocritical when yourselves are lacking it.

Lack of civility and death threats have gone up tremendously since your President Obama was elected. Even prior to that there were death threats against him and have increased by 400% since W. While all the world around you likes your President, you hate and despise him with your paranoid racist remarks, with your lack of civility. There must be something wrong with you if the whole world likes your President EXCEPT YOU!! YOU DON'T. The rest of the world is more grown up than you USA.

SHAME ON YOU USA!! GROW UP!!
THE COUNTRY WHO MURDERS THEIR PRESIDENTS LIKE A BANANA REPUBLIC!!

Here is an article about President Obama who faces 30 death threats a day.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/5967942/Barack-Obama-faces-30-death-threats-a-day-stretching-US-Secret-Service.html

Casey said...

I suggest you go to:
http://www.binscorner.com/pages/d/death-threats-against-bush-at-protests-i.html

try this:
Main Content
Secret Service: Threat level against Obama no greater than under Bush, Clinton - On Congress: Secret Service: Threat level against Obama no greater than under Bush, Clinton Categories:Homeland Security.Secret Service: Threat level against Obama no greater than under Bush, Clinton
Bit of a bombshell at this morning's Homeland Security Committee hearing
U.S. Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan dismissed published reports that the level of death threats against President Obama are four times greater than typical threat levels against recent presidents — claiming the current volume of threats is comparable to that under George W. Bush and Bill Clinton.



Once again, Anon2, you fail to do your homework before you post.

The rest of the world can love him all they want. Personally, I don't care. We are the ones that have to live under him and his agenda that the country doesn't want. We don't hate him, we just don't like his leadership!

You are truly unbelievable. You drink the Kool-Aid and don't bother to see if what you are reading is true or not. Sounds good in your mind, and fits what you want to believe, so you run with it. Problem is, the truth is not negotiable. Oh and that first website...? Enough with the Bullshit that the right is hateful. Those are YOUR people! What a tool!

Anonymous said...

Many citizens of the USA think that the world ɹ us. lol

Don't look any further than the end of their noses. Casey is one of them.

Casey said...

"Don't look any further than the end of their noses. Casey is one of them."---Anon2

At least I look before I post! Is that the best you've got Anon2?
No comment on the fact that you and your sources are WRONG about the death threats? No comment on your "peaceful, loving" Left? Aren't you one of the people that have accused the TeaParty of beng hateful and violent? Did you LOOK at those signs on that website? No, I am sure that you didn't.
Delusional people like you don't like facts and truth.

Casey said...

The new Obama care is turning out to be such a nightmare that even the Unions are opting out! So many companies are unable to afford the thing that they are getting government waivers!
GM is such a disaster that we bought the stock for $44 per share, and they are touting it as a great sucess when they are selling for $33 per share. Geee... that means that the tax payers only lost $11 per share. I guess under this administration and in comparison to the other disasters, this one is a sucess.
You see why we don't like the direction and the agenda of this administration? Even a moron could see that all of this is a miserable failure!

Casey said...

the new GM Leaf will cost only a mere $41,000. Too bad it is costing GM $40,000 to build it! Great sucess!

Anonymous said...

Glenn Beck - " slavery started with innocent ideas"

Rand Paul - "Corporations should have the right to discriminate"

Nary a off color face in a movement that claims "we want OUR country back"

Mark Williams (Tea Party Express spokesman) mocking A.A.'s "Dear Mr. Lincoln, We coloreds have taken a vote and decided that we don't cotton to that whole emancipation thing. Freedom means having to work for real,"

S.Palin "this country belongs to REAL americans"

Newt Grinrich - the president has a "Kenyan anti-colonial" world view.

Limbaugh - “The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies”

Virginia Beach Republican Party chair Karen Beauchamp email - "I went down this morning to sign up my Dog for welfare....So I explained to her that my Dog is black, unemployed, lazy, can't speak English and has no fríggíng clue who his Daddy is."

Naahhh, nothing racist in the Con/GOP/Tbagger party. heh

Anonymous said...

The Repub Commandmen­ts:
1. Thou shalt talk about Christian principles­, but not live by them.
2. Thou shalt attack opponents personally when you can’t win on policies.
3. Thou shalt call yourself pro-life, but be in favor of the death penalty.
4. Thou shalt call yourself pro-life, and put guns in the hands of school children.
5. Thou shalt give lip service to democracy and the Constituti­on while taking away civil liberties.
6. Profit is the Lord Thy God, thou shalt not put the people’s interest above the ‘free market” that ravaged the economy.
7. Thou shalt make sure fetuses have health coverage, but leave children and babies behind.
8. Thou shalt bear false witness against your opponents and propagate fear.
9. Thou shalt run on a platform for the people, then obstruct all motions toward progress in the name of ‘winning.’
10. Thou shalt call the media liberal, so that people forget that the media is owned by corporatio­ns with a conservati­ve fiscal agenda.

Anonymous said...

See who is laughing? Laughing stock of the world!

Spankin' Sarah Palin: A clown short of a circus
30.11.2010

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/30-11-2010/115998-spankin_sarah-0/

Excerpt:

"I have already called Sarah Palin a pith-headed bimbo from the back of beyond, in this column. I shall now go one step further. By attacking the democratically elected President of the United States of America at a sensitive time in her country's history, she shows the tact of a boorish drunkard bawling obscenities at a funeral."

And the above is just the beginning of the article! And every word of the article so true!! LOL

Anonymous said...

Can't resist; some additional excerpts of the article. Too bad that the article is too long to post in its entirety.

"If Sarah Palin is not some kind of a massive political joke in the USA, wheeled out to liven up the political scene from time to time with nonsensical and pastiche (one hopes) displays of sheer and utter ignorance, then it is worrying. It is even more so if anyone other than a manic depressive suffering from a chronic lack of lithium takes this...female...seriously.

Hockey Mum Sarah ex-Governess of Alaska is famous for her shrill shrieking style, displaying a pitifully shallow persona which one hopes is stage-managed to give the rest of the world a good chuckle at the Americans' ability and unique quality to make fun of themselves, a real-life female version of Homer Simpson-cum-Belching Barney at Mo's, giving us ever-more hilarious soundbites as she sets herself up as the dumbest woman on Earth."

"If anything is a threat to the national security of the United States of America, it is this screaming, unrefined oaf with as much class as a searing release of flatulence followed by hysterical giggling at a state banquet. Is this what the people of the USA deserve?

To attack the President of the country at a time when the USA needs to close ranks and stand together to consolidate the enormous strides his intelligent and respectful approach has achieved in building bridges, when her party's period in government bombed them, Spankin' Sarah Palin comes across as a pitifully inadequate anachronism from the times of the Far West."

Anonymous said...

You made some nice points there. I did a search on the subject matter and found mainly people will consent with your blog.

Casey said...

"Newt Grinrich - the president has a "Kenyan anti-colonial" world view."---Anon2

It is actually KEYNESIAN, Anon2. It is an economics theory---not a place in Africa!

According to Keynesian theory, some microeconomic-level actions—if taken collectively by a large proportion of individuals and firms—can lead to inefficient aggregate macroeconomic outcomes, where the economy operates below its potential output and growth rate.

Your "quote" by Mr Grinrich is inaccurate---as usual. He actually said, "KEYNESIAN anti colonial world view"

Anonymous said...

أشكركم على نشر هذا ، كان من المفيد جدا ، وقال الكثير