Saturday, February 26, 2011

The Koch Brothers and their Right-Wing Cronies Are Turning America Into The Twilight Zone

From The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles -- February 22, 2011

The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street

By Marty Kaplan

The power has gone out in a typical American town. Wait -- it's not just the electricity. The phones don't work, either. Portable radios are dead. Cars won't start.

But then lawn mowers and cars and lights inexplicably start and stop on their own. What's going on? A meteor? Sunspots? Or are there, as Tommy's comic book suggests, aliens among us, preparing for a takeover? Suspicion poisons the air. Neighbor turns on neighbor. A scapegoat is blamed. A shot is fired. Panic, madness, riot.

And while the humans behave monstrously, the real monsters watch from a nearby hilltop, working a little gizmo that messes with the power on Maple Street, and marveling how easy it is to manipulate these earthlings into destroying themselves.

In what is arguably the best Twilight Zone episode ever, "The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street," Rod Serling wrote a suburban Lord of the Flies, a parable about the fragility of civilization, paranoia and the susceptibility of nice folks to manipulation.

Watching it when it first aired, in the depths of the nuclear arms race, people thought it was meant to ward off a witch-hunt for Reds under the bed. Today, watching what's been going on in Madison, Wisconsin, as well as in Washington, D.C., I can't help thinking that the real monsters are chortling at their success in pitting neighbor against neighbor, and I can't help marveling at their genius for distraction and unaccountability.

The monsters aren't Wisconsin's public employees whose right to collective bargaining has helped their families lead middle-class lives, and who have repeatedly declared their willingness to return to the table and negotiate a shared sacrifice. The monsters are on Wall Street, where state pension funds were sunk into toxic sub-prime mortgage-backed securities. The monsters are on K Street, where lobbyists are fighting financial industry oversight. The monsters are the politicians who are using Wisconsin's deficit as a pretext to demonize public employees and bust their unions.

If you look at the budget that House Republicans just passed, if you listen to the "so be it" language of their leadership, you'd think that the federal deficit is caused by the very people who who've been suffering the most in this recession.

But the monsters aren't low-income pregnant women and mothers who can't afford adequate nutrition for their families; or sick Americans who can't find health insurance to cover them; or blue-collar workers who want to retire at an age when there's still some life left in their bodies; or students who can't afford college without Pell Grants; or people who think their government's job includes preventing their air and water from poisoning them.

Sitting on the hilltop, watching Americans turn one another into bogeymen, evading scrutiny and responsibility, are the real sources of our distress.

They're the bankers who've extorted trillions of public treasure, blowing up the deficit while awarding themselves inconceivably fat bonuses.

They're the billionaires who've benefited from a massive transfer of wealth from the middle to the top, and whose political puppets protect them from paying their fair share of taxes.

They're the corporations whose cash has convinced Congress to deregulate industry after industry, despite all evidence that it is the enforcement of rules -- not the magic of the marketplace -- that protects the public's rights.

They're the defense contractors and pork appropriators who've used the cover of "national security" to shield the Pentagon's budget and its procurement process from the cuts and reforms that even Republicans like the Secretary of Defense are advocating.

They're the front groups and propagandists, like FreedomWorks and Fox, who use class warfare and culture wars in order to turn Americans against their own economic interests.

They're the Supreme Court justices whose Citizens United decision, overthrowing a century of settled law, has made our campaign finance system an open sewer, and whose indifference to conflicts of interest in a coming case promises to throw sick people back onto the tender mercies of insurers and to destroy our best hope to curb Medicare costs - further ballooning the deficit and providing cover for even more draconian cuts.

The game in Washington is to use the deficit as camouflage for destroying government's capacity to promote the general welfare. The game in Wisconsin and other states whose new Republican governors and legislative majorities are feeling their oats is to shelter the income of the wealthiest, and to balance the budget on the backs of the middle class.

At the end of the episode, Rod Serling says this: "The tools of conquest do not necessarily come with bombs and explosions and fallout. There are weapons that are simply thoughts, attitudes, prejudices to be found only in the minds of men. For the record: Prejudices can kill, and suspicion can destroy, and a thoughtless frightened search for a scapegoat has a fallout all of its own -- for the children, and the children yet unborn. And the pity of it is that these things cannot be confined to the twilight zone."

Sometimes it's hard to watch the news and not think that things are surreal. The other day, when what's been happening in Madison reminded me of what happened on "Maple Street," I suddenly realized the theme music that goes with it.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

GOP = Greedy Obnoxious Predators
GOP = Greedy Obnoxious Predators
GOP = Greedy Obnoxious Predators

Anonymous said...

Now that's what I would call a union made in heaven eh? GOP presidential wannabees tied with DA FOX. LOL

You betcha!! *wink* *wink*

Would any one of them give up their Fox $$$?

Not a sure bet ..... unless one has already milked the cow sufficiently.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/01/john-king-gop-fox-news-2012_n_829535.html

John King Points Out How Many Potential GOP 2012 Candidates Work For Fox News

CNN's John King brought up the fact that many of the top potential Republican contenders for the 2012 presidential nomination work for Fox News.

On Monday's "John King USA," King used some of his patented magic-wall skills to highlight this fact. He pointed to images of Mike Huckabee, Sarah Palin, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich, and noted that all four have one thing in common: their affiliation with Fox News.

Speaking about Huckabee, King said, "he works for the other guys, since June 2008, would have to give that up if he runs. Most people think in the end he won't."

Palin, he said, would have to give "somewhere of the ballpark of $1 million" up if she cut her ties with Fox News to run.

Gingrich, he said, has been "on the Fox payroll since 1999...his aides can't answer the question: if he's just exploring, does that mean he has to give it up?"

Anonymous said...

Gem of an article!! Guess that even the fix addicts of the GOP = Gullible Overbearing Pariahs don't know this about their "news" source. *Gotcha*

This is why Fix News distorts the facts and the real news. Lies blessed by your judicial system.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/07/31/364678/-Fox-News-wins-in-court

Excerpts:
Tue Jul 31, 2007 at 09:14 AM EDT
Fox News wins in court

In February 2003, a Florida Court of Appeals unanimously agreed with an assertion by FOX News that there is no rule against distorting or falsifying the news in the United States.

Lawyers paid by Bill O'Reilly's bosses argued in court that Fox can lie with impunity.

It's their right under the 1st Amendment

FOX asserted that there are no written rules against distorting news in the media. They argued that, under the First Amendment, broadcasters have the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on public airwaves.

In a stunningly narrow interpretation of FCC rules, the Florida Appeals court claimed that the FCC policy against falsification of the news does not rise to the level of a "law, rule, or regulation," it was simply a "policy." Therefore, it is up to the station whether or not it wants to report honestly.

During their appeal, FOX asserted that there are no written rules against distorting news in the media. They argued that, under the First Amendment, broadcasters have the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on public airwaves. Fox attorneys did not dispute Akre’s claim that they pressured her to broadcast a false story, they simply maintained that it was their right to do so.

Anonymous said...

Nice stats who lies more, the Rethugs or the Dems.

http://dandavison.com/politifact/

Casey said...

You stupid woman! That is not what this was about! The woman that was suing was suing FOX under the Wistler Blower Act. Fox just argued that the suit couldn't be won under that Act as " the FCC did not deserve protection under Florida’s whistle blower statute, because Florida’s whistle blower law states that an employer must violate an adopted “law, rule, or regulation."
They argued that it was not a LAW for a news media source to lie. Not the same thing. It was a defense; not an admission.
The agruement was, did she have a case under that statute, she didn't.
I know that this may be difficult for your pea brain to proces, but TRY to read background before you go off on one of your Leftist rants!

Anonymous said...

No commentary necessary on the link below. It's excellent and right on the mark!
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/276-74/5123-fox-news-lies-keep-them-out-of-canada

Excerpt:
Fox News' Lies Keep Them Out of Canada

s America's middle class battles for its survival on the Wisconsin barricades - against various Koch Oil surrogates and the corporate toadies at Fox News - fans of enlightenment, democracy and justice can take comfort from a significant victory north of the Wisconsin border. Fox News will not be moving into Canada after all! The reason: Canadian regulators announced last week they would reject efforts by Canada's right-wing Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, to repeal a law that forbids lying on broadcast news.

Canada's Radio Act requires that "a licenser may not broadcast ... any false or misleading news." The provision has kept Fox News and right-wing talk radio out of Canada and helped make Canada a model for liberal democracy and freedom. As a result of that law, Canadians enjoy high quality news coverage, including the kind of foreign affairs and investigative journalism that flourished in this country before Ronald Reagan abolished the "Fairness Doctrine" in 1987. Political dialogue in Canada is marked by civility, modesty, honesty, collegiality, and idealism that have pretty much disappeared on the US airwaves. When Stephen Harper moved to abolish the anti-lying provision of the Radio Act, Canadians rose up to oppose him fearing that their tradition of honest non-partisan news would be replaced by the toxic, overtly partisan, biased and dishonest news coverage familiar to American citizens who listen to Fox News and talk radio. Harper's proposal was timed to facilitate the launch of a new right-wing network, "Sun TV News" which Canadians call "Fox News North."

Harper, often referred to as "George W. Bush's Mini Me," is known for having mounted a Bush-like war on government scientists, data collectors, transparency, and enlightenment in general. He is a wizard of all the familiar tools of demagoguery; false patriotism, bigotry, fear, selfishness and belligerent religiosity.

Harper's attempts to make lying legal on Canadian television are a stark admission that right-wing political ideology can only dominate national debate through dishonest propaganda. Since corporate profit-taking is not an attractive vessel for populism, a political party or broadcast network that makes itself the tool of corporate and financial elites must lie to make its agenda popular with the public. In the Unites States, Fox News and talk radio, the sock puppets of billionaires and corporate robber barons, have become the masters of propaganda and distortion on the public airwaves. Fox News' notoriously biased and dishonest coverage of the Wisconsin's protests is a prime example of the brand of news coverage Canada has smartly avoided."

Anonymous said...

Video on Fox News:

Fox News lies about Violent Wisconsin.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RClJ6vK9x_4

Hmmm, palm trees in the background of the video. What does that tell you? Since when does Wisconsin grow palm trees?

Only Fix Noise trekkies would swallow this false reporting with hook line and sinker that this so-called violent protest took place in Wisconsin. LOL

Brandon said...

Funny, I was just checking up on your blog and you still don't want to talk about the important things like the debt.

Anonymous said...

http://yfrog.com/h08midoj

Nice .... palm trees grow in Wisconsin after all. LMAO