From The Washington Post -- May 17, 2011:
West Wing Briefing: Obama complicates 2012 campaign for Republicans
By Perry Bacon Jr.
The Republican presidential primary season was expected to provide a months-long Obama-bashing session, with the winner being the man or woman who best combined attacks on President Obama with a cogent argument for how he or she could defeat him in November 2012.
That might still happen. But for now, Obama’s influence has been felt in a different way: through complicating the race for several potential Republican candidates.
By releasing his birth certificate and then mocking Donald Trump at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner a few days later for igniting the controversy in the first place, the president effectively ended the real estate mogul’s brief flirtation with running.
Other Republicans have suffered from an Obama problem too. The president’s aides last week enthusiastically linked the health care plan then-Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney signed in 2006 with the federal one adopted four years later, while Romney devoted a speech to trying to separate the two.
The president himself has openly suggested Jon Huntsman’s service in the administration as ambassador to China could complicate the former Utah governor’s presidential aspirations.
Sharp attacks by the White House have put Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), one of the GOP’s rising stars, on the defensive about his plan to reform Medicare.
In his campaign fundraisers, Obama constantly argues that he is focused on governing now, leaving the campaigning to his Chicago-based reelection operation. White House press secretary Jay Carney recently told reporters that he had not been in any meeting with the president in which the 2012 GOP field was discussed.
But little Obama says happens by accident. His diatribe against Trump at the White House dinner was in a carefully written speech. A series of administration officials and allies have linked the health care law Romney adopted with “Obamacare.”
The strategy could pay major dividends for the president. If Trump had run, he would have had almost no chance of winning the GOP nomination. But his comments, from his obsession with discussing falsehoods about the president’s birth to criticizing Obama for playing basketball, would have been covered extensively in the press and forced the White House to respond.
The comments about Romney and Huntsman may be more important. If Obama and other Democrats can spread a message that the pair are too centrist, and thereby encourage Republicans to nominate other contenders, it would eliminate two of the GOP’s strongest potential candidates.
In some ways, this approach has already worked: Romney has distanced himself from a bipartisan achievement (the Massachusetts health care law) that could have been an asset in a general election.
Ryan, meanwhile, was unlikely to run for president or be tapped as vice-president in any event. But the aggressive attacks on his ideas by Democrats have turned him from a highly regarded “Young Gun” in the GOP to a more controversial figure. Another 2012 Republican candidate, Newt Gingrich, slammed Ryan’s ideas on Sunday.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Judging by the number of comments you have been getting, I would say you liberals are all washed up! To weak to answer any of my posts that don't fit your liberal talking points.
Dearest Brandon:
It's impossible, Brandon. You are far too brain-washed for anyone to communicate with you.
You are too naive to realize that you are only supporting an insane system of corporate feudalism -- which is destroying capitalism and wiping out America.
Do you honestly believe that any single individual stands a chance against the economic power of corporations and billionaires? Why do you think collective bargaining and class action lawsuits came into being? To create an American economic system of separation of powers, and checks and balances.
Try matching the power of a billionaire employer against that of a 40-hour a week employee. The employee has less chance than a snowball roasting in Hell.
Obama created a system of Healthcare for all Americans. So --- the billionaires are freaking out. How dare Obama do that? Obamacare!! We must repeal it. I haven't seen a single billionaire volunteer to terminate his own health insurance. But --- health insurance for poor people? That's Socialism, that's Communism, that's Un-American. Well, if that's Un-American, Brandon, then these folks have a pretty sick idea of what being "American" is.
If America is only for the rich -- and nothing for anyone else -- Brandon, is that America for you?
How on Earth can you possibly support programs that only help the rich and economically destroy everyone else? Are you naive? Are you a fool? Are you a child?
You, Brandon, will never get into the upper class of this nation. All the cards are stacked overwhelmingly against you. And, if by some miracle you do reach the upper class (as impossible as that seems), how long do you think that your privileged status will last, if you destroy the middle class and the consumer class? For years, America has had a strong, powerful, prosperous nation -- because of labor unions, collective bargaining, minimum wage and maximum hour laws -- all of which helped create a healthy middle class and consumer class
which enabled the wealthiest people to keep prospering -- and allowed upward mobility so that people like you, Brandon, could in fact move up to a higher economic status. Excellent public schools and educational public TV were other weapons in America's arsenal of upper economic mobility.
Now, all we hear is: More tax beaks for the wealthy, and eliminate benefits for anyone else. Of course, billionaires are waging a war against public schools and educational television. In their myopic short-sightedness, they believe anything that might educate poor people and teach them how to think is a threat to their own current wealth and power. An ignorant population is much easier to control.
More tax breaks for oil companies -- to supplement their current record-breaking profits. But - eliminate all economic benefits for the poor and middle class.
And, what's this you say about states' rights vs. the federal government? Well, it was the states that instituted all the Jim Crow laws -- all the racial segregation laws -- and it was the federal government which eliminated all of that garbage. Even today, it's the states that want to ban Same Sex marriage and keep marijuana illegal (our own 21st century version of that insane sickness called
"Prohibition").
So, you see, Brandon, "State's Rights" is a Bunch of Bull! What is important is Individual Rights -- the rights of the individual. And, from America's Day One, when the Bill of Rights was first enacted (the
first Ten Amendments to the United States Constitution) -- it has been the federal government which has protected and defended individual
rights, and state governments which have been hell-bent on destroying them.
So, the answer, my dear friend, Brandon, is plain and simple --- you are supporting a system whose only goal is to keep you down, and you are fighting tooth and nail against laws and programs that would lift you up.
"America has had a strong, powerful, prosperous nation -- because of labor unions, collective bargaining, minimum wage and maximum hour laws"
-CJP
What a load of crap, these are the things that are killing American jobs today! You stupid simple liberals believe all you have to do is force employers to pay higher wages and everyone will be better off. Hasnt worked yet and never will. The problem you dont understand is that you are killing jobs for those who are young, old, disabled and/or uneducated.
Americans are suffering because they cant work over 40hrs at there dead end jobs, nobody will pay them overtime.
Americans are suffering because unions are driving the price of goods and services up.
Americans are suffering because we have to pay higher taxes to support government union workers.
Americans are suffering because unions protect worthless teachers only because they have served their time!
Wake up!
And rather than going off on another one of your rants why dont you try answering one of my SIMPLE questions you seem be hinding from?
"More tax breaks for oil companies -- to supplement their current record-breaking profits. But - eliminate all economic benefits for the poor and middle class."
CJP
Here is another very simple question, why dont you give this one a try?
WHY NOT CUT SUBSIDIES FOR ALL COMPANIES, INCLUDING GE?
So, you see, Brandon, "State's Rights" is a Bunch of Bull! What is important is Individual Rights -- the rights of the individual. And, from America's Day One, when the Bill of Rights was first enacted (the
first Ten Amendments to the United States Constitution) -- it has been the federal government which has protected and defended individual
rights, and state governments which have been hell-bent on destroying them.
-CJP
Talking from both sides of your mouth, again! You dont support individual rights you only want the federal government to tell EVERYONE how to live their lives the way YOU see fit. That is the difference between you and I. I want Americans to do what they think is right for themselves. I would love to be able to opt out of SS and medicare but your would let me. You dont want me to and as a result I will retire with even less money. Thanks! Sounds like the reason middle class Americans cant get ahead is because of the federal government. I support smaller government and individual freedom. Let people live there lives! Let gays marry, let people smoke pot and let me opt out of SS and medicare. You can ride that ship to the bottom of the ocean. I am finding a way off!
Post a Comment