From The Huffington Post -- May 15, 2011:
By Joseph A. Palermo, Associate Professor of American History, California State University, Sacramento
The Republican Supreme Court Sticks It to the Little Guy (Again)
Once again the United States Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Roberts has shown the nation it will always favor corporations over people even if it means conjuring new law out of thin air. Like Citizens United, the recent 5-4 ruling in AT&T's favor gutting the power of consumers to file class-action lawsuits against giant corporations tips the scales of justice against the people and renders the enormous power of corporations even more enormous.
When I first heard about the case, AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion there was little doubt in my mind that the Gang of Five -- John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, and Clarence Thomas would figure out a way to ignore Supreme Court precedent and again apply their judicial activism in service to the corporations, and by extension, to the oligarchy they apparently believe the "founders" intended.
It's kind of funny when we see Republican presidential candidates like Mitt Romeny, Tim Pawlenty, and Newt Gingrich pandering to the "little guy" denouncing "elites" who are trampling on their rights only to remain mute on the fact that their beloved Republican Supreme Court never, ever rules in favor of the "little guy."
The Republican president Ronald Reagan gave us Scalia and Kennedy; the Republican president George Herbert Walker Bush gave us Thomas; and the Republican president George W. Bush gave us Roberts and Alito. This cabal has shown over and over again where its true loyalties lie, not to "the law," not to "the Constitution," not to "calling balls and strikes," but to a 21st century version of corporate feudalism. This new corporate feudalism that the High Court is determined to thrust on the nation is even more exploitative than the earlier brand of Medieval feudalism because it is absent noblesse oblige.
The serfs toiling on the corporate plantation can only continue to pay Chase and Bank of America for their underwater mortgages, ExxonMobil and Chevron for their $4 a gallon gas, and AT&T, Comcast, T-Mobile and the rest for the privilege of communicating in a modern society. And if the serfs seek redress the High Court will slap them down before they can get anything substantial off the ground. With Citizens United placing a stranglehold of corporate power over our state, local, and federal system of elections, we cannot turn to our political "leaders" for redress, we can't turn to the courts, and we certainly can't turn to trying to morally persuade sociopathic non-human entities called corporations -- so where does that leave us?
In the current context of unrestrained corporate dominance it's unconscionable that the Obama administration has not done more to blunt its disastrous effects. The Justice and Treasury Departments, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Internal Revenue Service, etc. could be doing a hell of a lot more in bringing balance to the equation of corporations versus people. The administration's lagging performance in holding Wall Street accountable is well known, but it won't even lift a finger to block grotesque mergers like the one between Comcast and NBC Universal, and AT&T and T Mobile. In all these mergers and acquisitions it's always the consumers and the employees who lose, while the CEOs and a select few of shareholders and financiers make out like the bandits they are.
Nothing illustrates the corruption rampant in Washington more than the recent resignation of Federal Communications Commission member, Meredith Attwell Baker, a Republican who Obama appointed to show how "bipartisan" he can be, who is now going to work as a lavishly paid shill for the very industry she was supposedly "regulating." Ms. Baker will now make the big bucks serving Comcast/NBC Universal after she voted for the merger of Comcast and NBC Universal. Sweet. And few in the Beltway see anything unsavory about it.
Our political leaders, our Supreme Court, our captains of industry and finance, are so out of touch it's going to be a long, long time before ordinary working people see any relief. All of our institutions, political, economic, even religious, social, and cultural, all of them, are failing the people miserably in pursuit of the Almighty Buck. The cunning game of appointing young ideologues to the bench has paid off handsomely for the corporate power structure. Someone should tell those people running around in tri-cornered hats and talking about the "founders" that it might be wise to save an ounce of their collective wrath for the Republicans who have appointed five Justices who are trampling on individual freedoms in service of corporations.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
22 comments:
Back to the middle ages and its feudalism. Castles (corporations now) surrounded by little huts where their slaves would work for peanuts or nothing.
As the wealthy business man said to the priest: you keep the folk ignorant and I'll keep them poor.
Now it's the Conservatives who keep their sheeple dumb AND take all what they can from ALL the citizens.
Very well said, Anon. Right On, A-Non.
I couldn't have said it better myself. Kudos to you.
Anon
You dont seem to understand your own analogy. Government is the castle, not buisness.
CJP
What do you think of low and middle class Americans making a profit off of filing their taxes each year? Why are my tax dollar going to someone elses refund?
Time to pose a question:
Why do your tax dollars go to the ultra rich who use loopholes or take their $$ to tax havens overseas to avoid taxes?
I.E. GE made over 10 billion profit and didn't pay any taxes.
Don't attack the poor and the middle class since you're one of them.
Anon:
Why can't I attack the poor or middle class? Also I do have a problem with GE not paying taxes, but how would you fix that problem? I would guess you simple minded liberals would just increase the tax brackets again!
Second, my tax dollars are not going into the wealthy pockets the way the poor and middle class is profiting off our failed tax system!
"Second, my tax dollars are not going into the wealthy pockets the way the poor and middle class is profiting off our failed tax system!"
Since when are the poor and middle class profiting due to a failed tax system? It's the uber wealthy who evade paying taxes and THAT's one of the reasons your country has a failed tax system.
You have a choice as to where your tax dollars go????? ^.^ FYI - they go into the pockets of the uber wealthy who hardly pay tax. Someone has to compensate for those losses in tax revenue and of course that's on the backs of the middle class.
Wages and salaries of the middle class have hardly risen since the 80's while the ultra rich increased their wealth tremendously during that same period.
Your posts always are about ME ME ME ME. Never about the state of the country. What about the common good of/for the country instead of yourself? People like you who are consumed by greed, avarice and egoism are the ones who will turn the country into a banana republic/third world country.
The USA is a backward country due to its shortsightedness instead of long time planning for the future. I want it NOW! Instant gratification is all what many if not most citizens care about.
Anon your saying I am against raising taxes on the wealth but I am not one of the wealthy. So how are my posts about me me me?
"Since when are the poor and middle class profiting due to a failed tax system?"
Anon
Are you really that ignorant? An individual can pay $3500 in fedal withholding over the course of a year and when he/she files at the end of the year, he/she can claim $6-$7 thousand back! That sounds like a pretty healthy profit!
Also, I am not against fixing the tax code, only against raising the tax rates. Again and again I have asked you and CJP for solutions but you offer NOTHING!
Why the hell not...
Anon
How would you fix our broken tax code so all Americans paid their fair share?
"The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, IN PROPORTION TO THEIR RESPECTIVE ABILITIES, that is, IN PROPORTION TO THE REVENUE WHICH THEY RESPECTIVELY ENJOY UNDER THE PROTECTION OF THE STATE"
The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith, 1776.
Well said, Anon. Beautiful. Right on Point.
Tax rates should be raised on people in the upper tax brackets, back to where they were in the Clinton years. That's the last time we had a balanced budget and national economic prosperity.
Every civilized community provides for its poor, sick and old people. Successful people pay higher taxes so that we can all live in a healthy and prosperous country.
Sorry CJP
Your wrong, again! Don't worry I am not surprised.
CLINTON NEVER HAD A BALANCE BUDGET! He was close but do move some money around to make it seem like there was more money coming and less going out. If you don't believe me look at our national debt under Clinton. Year after year it went up.
About raising the tax rates... Why would you raise the tax rates? They are high enough. Why not go to a simple 15-20% for all Americans with no deductions? That would raise taxes on some wealthy and lower taxes for other but everyone would pay their fair share. Then the lower and middle classes will stop profitting from the tax system.
Would you stand behind that option?
CJP:
What was it you were saying about republicans, "just keep lying about something till people take it as fact"? That seems like what you have been doing about the Clinton budget myth!
The lower and middle classes are not "profiting", Brandon. Only the upper class is profiting. The tax system is designed to help people who are not in the upper class simply survive. It is set up to provide social safety nets in terms of health insurance, food stamps, low income housing, Social Security for seniors, etc.
Taxes are also used to provide roads, highways, infra-structure, military defense, etc. Why shouldn't the people who are earning the most from our system pay higher taxes to assure the continuation of an economic system which has been so beneficial to them?
We have a graduated income tax. The people who earn more pay a higher tax rate than people who earn less. After taxes, these big earners still retain the lion's share of our country's wealth.
Theoretically, this country is based upon Judeo-Christian principles, which involve giving charity and helping the poor. Now is the first time in our history when it has become fashionable, in some circles, to blame the poor for being poor, argue that they are entitled to nothing, and take away whatever meager resources the government is now providing them.
2,000 years ago Jesus preached many sermons admonishing the people of his day to take care of the poor. Our tax system is designed to accomplish these goals in America. So many people today call themselves Christians and yet would turn their backs on the poor and take away whatever modest programs our government provides for them. If private industry provided these social and economic safety nets, there would be no need for such government programs. Obviously, that is not the case.
I guess you don't understand what I mean when I say the poor and middle class are profiting from our tax system. Let me make it simple for you. They get more back from the IRS then they pay!
The poor don't get tax refunds on money they didn't earn. They get benefits from the social safety net that we all pay for through our taxes.
CJP
Do you not understand that the poor AND middle class get money from the IRS they never paid in? I don't have a problem with a social safety net. I do have a problem with how its managed.
Do you understand the difference between a tax deduction and a tax credit?
Campaign finance is the biggest impediment facing American politics in this century!!!
I am an African American woman with naturally kinky/coarse hair. I decided to stop using relaxers over a year ago, furthermore straightening my hair became a difficult task. I could never seem to get the
results I was looking for out of a flat iron without going to a professional hair salon and spending $65.00 a visit.
Post a Comment