Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Mitt Romney's Tax Plan: "Pamper the Rich and Soak the Middle Class"

From The Progress Report -- August 1, 2012:

Mitt Gets Worse

Mitt Romney’s Plan for a $2,000 Middle Class Tax Hike

As we reported yesterday, we already know that Mitt Romney has an economic plan to enrich the wealthy at the expense of everyone else. Well, a new non-partisan, independent analysis of Romney’s tax plan released today by the Tax Policy Center shows just how far Romney would go to help the wealthy at the expense of the middle class.

Here’s the rundown.

Much Higher Taxes on the Middle Class

Romney’s plan raises taxes on the bottom 95 percent of Americans.
The average middle class family with children will see a tax increase of more than $2,000.
Among everyone making less than $200,000, the tax increase averages out to more than $500 per person.
Much Lower Taxes on the Wealthiest Americans

Romney’s plan includes a large tax cut for the only the wealthiest 5 percent of Americans.

A new $247,000 tax cut for the wealthiest 0.1 percent on top of the Bush tax cuts.

A new $87,000 tax cut for every millionaire on top of the Bush tax cuts.

How It Could Be Even Worse for the Middle Class

The authors of the study bent over backwards to make the analysis as favorable as possible for Romney’s plan. For example, the analysis assumes that almost every deduction — think mortgage interest, employer-provided health care, and charitable contributions — would be completely eliminated for people making over $200,000 a year. Nobody have ever proposed that and, as a practical matter, it’s almost impossible to imagine Congress passing such a plan. Since Romney has promised to make his plan revenue-neutral, every dollar in deductions kept by the wealthy means another dollar in increased taxes for the middle class.

In short, Romney’s plan is likely to be much, much more favorable to the wealthy and demand much, much more of the middle class than even this analysis finds. $2,000 should be thought of as the floor for middle class tax increases under the Romney plan, not the ceiling.

Romney Struggles to Respond

In typical fashion, “The Romney campaign on Wednesday declined to address the specifics of the analysis,” reported the Washington Post. In other words, the analysis is correct so they couldn’t really argue with it.

Their only real response was to call it a “partisan” study because one of the co-authors is a Democrat (the other worked in President George H.W. Bush’s White House).

The only problem with that attack? During the Republican primary, the Romney campaign cited the Tax Policy Center on several occasions in order to attack Rick Santorum, Rick Perry, and Newt Gingrich. In fact, the Romney campaign once referred to the Tax Policy Center’s “objective, third party analysis.”

House Republicans Join the Middle Class Tax Increasing Party

While it’s almost impossible to imagine Congress passing a plan that would eliminate most or all tax benefits for the wealthy, it’s definitely possible to imagine them passing one going after the middle class. In fact, it happened just today.

Today, the House of Representatives passed a plan that slashed taxes on the wealthy while raising them on the middle class. The Republican plan passed today included:

Another extension of the extra tax cuts on income over $250,000 that would benefit just the top 2 percent of Americans.
A tax increase for nearly 25 MILLION working and middle class families.
Tax increases on military families.
Amazingly, the Republican plan raises taxes on ten times more people than the Senate-passed Democratic plan, which finally ends extra tax cuts that the wealthiest Americans don’t need and we simply cannot afford:

Since the president promised to veto the Republican plan and it was already defeated in the Senate last week, Republicans are once again the only people in Washington standing in the way of tax cuts for 98 percent of Americans.

IN ONE SENTENCE: Mitt Romney and Republicans will do anything to slash taxes on the wealthy — even if that means forcing millions of middle class families to pay thousands more every year.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Rachel Maddow's video:
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-rachel-maddow-show/48454163

The Rachel Maddow Show | Aired on August 02, 2012
Romney on taxes: 'You're going to have to take my word for it'

Excellent piece of work Rachel!

Anonymous said...

http://www.businessinsider.com/mitt-romney-tax-returns-release-massachusetts-governor-election-obama-2012-7

Here's What Happened The Last Time Mitt Romney Refused To Release His Tax Returns

In 2002 while Mitt Romney was running for governor of Massachusetts, Romney found himself engulfed in a "will-he-won't-he" controversy that bears some similarities to the pressure mounting on him to release his tax returns in today's campaign.

Romney's 2002 tax-return controversy dealt mostly with his residency status in Massachusetts.

According to state law, Romney had to have established permanent residency in Massachusetts for the seven years prior to running for office — but Romney had spent the previous three years in Salt Lake City, Utah, running the 2002 Winter Olympic Games. According to a March 18, 2002, Boston Globe article (behind paywall), Romney filed tax returns listing Utah as his primary residence, but maintained "official residence" in Belmont, Mass.
Excerpt:
In May, questions about his residency status started to pick up, and gained steam when it was revealed that he paid property taxes in Utah from 1999-2001, and he received a huge discount as a result

Anonymous said...

http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2012/07/07/mitt-romney-committed-voter-fraud-looks-likely/

Mitt Romney Committed Voter Fraud—Looks Likely

Excerpts:

Far be it for me to call TPM’s Josh Marshall “stupid”, though it does make for a more eye-catching headline. It also happens to be a fact, as I see it, that Romney’s refusal to release his tax returns from any year prior to 2010, and especially his local state return from 2010, is about hiding evidence of a felony crime, as much or likely more than it is about hiding embarrassing details of off-shore bank accounts in the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, Switzerland, etc.

What cannot be so easily brushed off or propagandized away — not without completely undermining the current culmination of the GOP’s nearly-decade long effort in creating the imaginary notion of massive Democratic “voter fraud” which must be rectified immediately with polling place Photo ID restrictions (actually little more than the GOP’s attempt to suppress the legitimate Democratic-leaning vote while preventing almost no existing voter fraud) — is the likelihood that those tax returns would reveal indisputable evidence that this year’s GOP standard-bearer is an actual voter fraud felon himself … .

To date, there has been no legitimate explanation for Mitt Romney having cast a vote in the January 2010 Special Election for the U.S. Senate between Scott Brown and Martha Coakley. At the time of his vote (which he has admitted doing) he owned no house in MA, and yet he was registered to vote from the address of his son’s unfinished basement in Belmont, MA.

While Romney owned houses in both CA (purchased in May of 2008 for $12.5m) and NH (April of 2009 for $3.5m) at the time, it wouldn’t be until July of 2010 — a full six months after the Special Election to replace the late Sen. Ted Kennedy — that the state’s former Governor would once again own a house there, after purchasing an $895,000 townhouse in Belmont.

Anonymous said...

http://www.scribd.com/doc/101882979/IRATaxLetter-8-2

Read it!! Congress also wants to know how Romney parked $100 million in an IRA that has a $6K annual contribution cap.

Anonymous said...

http://www.policymic.com/articles/11525/10-things-romney-is-probably-hiding-in-his-tax-returns

10 Things Romney is Probably Hiding in His Tax Returns

10) Swiss Bank Account
9) $100 Million IRA
8) Cayman Islands Investments
7) 2009 Federal Income Tax Liability: $0
6) Deducted 2008 Expenses
5) Income received from Bain even after he supposedly “retired” in 1999
4) Investments in “vulture funds”
3) Nine consecutive years of a 15% or below effective tax rate.
2) Romney’s net worth could be higher than $250 million
1) Simple home furnishings.

All points from 1-10 have its explanations at the above website.

Anonymous said...

http://www.alternet.org/print/hot-news-views/rachel-maddow-goes-deep-mitt-romneys-tax-return-hypocrisy

Great going Rachel!!!

Anonymous said...

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/08/02/1115963/-Rachel-Maddow-helps-President-Obama-insert-Political-Shiv-Twists-the-Knife

Watch the video! Awesome Rachel!!

Anonymous said...

Who is Mitt Romney, and why is he so sneaky?


Winter Olympics records: DESTROYED

Gubernatorial computer hard drives and e-mails: DELETED

Bain Involvement: DENIED

Offshore accounts: HIDDEN

Tax Returns: WITHHELD

Who IS this guy???

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnrUWd_XLQI&feature=player_embedded#!

Mitt Romney Documentary on the BBC

A documentary that would never air in the US

Anonymous said...

Interview - David Neiwert - How Hate Talk Radicalized the American Right

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etoyumdyRS4

Anonymous said...

Mitt Romney: Gold Medal in Dishonesty

http://truth-out.org/news/item/10481-mitt-romney-gold-medal-in-dishonesty

Excerpt:

Third, Bain reportedly would not invest in companies profiting from alcohol and tobacco, which violate Mormon behavioral standards, but Romney apparently has no problem accepting tens of millions of dollars from people like casino magnates Steven Wynn and Sheldon Adelson, despite the fact that Mormonism considers gambling a sin. I'm sure Romney hasn't asked either billionaire if any of the money they donated might have also come from the proceeds of any of other sins that go on in Las Vegas casinos, any of which would also violate Mormon standards.